<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Real Agenda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://real-agenda.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://real-agenda.com</link>
	<description>Thursday, May 17, 2012</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Angela Merkel is Latest Casualty of Global Uprising by George L. Tirebiter</title>
		<link>http://real-agenda.com/2012/05/13/angela-merkel-is-latest-casualty-of-global-uprising/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George L. Tirebiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://real-agenda.com/?p=17392#comment-7534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~~~TO THE MODERATOR~~ I screwed up my email address above but fixed it here. sorry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~~~TO THE MODERATOR~~ I screwed up my email address above but fixed it here. sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Angela Merkel is Latest Casualty of Global Uprising by George L. Tirebiter</title>
		<link>http://real-agenda.com/2012/05/13/angela-merkel-is-latest-casualty-of-global-uprising/#comment-7533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George L. Tirebiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://real-agenda.com/?p=17392#comment-7533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way to &quot;fix&quot; socialism is for it to die a painful death. But sure as shit it&#039;s going to be reborn in the hearts of the lazy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to &#8220;fix&#8221; socialism is for it to die a painful death. But sure as shit it&#8217;s going to be reborn in the hearts of the lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 Astronauts, Scientists Slam NASA on Man-made Climate Change by Gerald Falbel</title>
		<link>http://real-agenda.com/2012/04/11/50-astronauts-scientists-slam-nasa-on-man-made-climate-change/#comment-7520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald Falbel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://real-agenda.com/?p=16655#comment-7520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest a course in Geology 101, which shows that 65 million years ago the earth was struck with an asteroid which killed the dinosaurs, cooled it down, and brought the CO2 down.  Maybe we have to wait for another asteroid to solve the current man-made CO2 increase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest a course in Geology 101, which shows that 65 million years ago the earth was struck with an asteroid which killed the dinosaurs, cooled it down, and brought the CO2 down.  Maybe we have to wait for another asteroid to solve the current man-made CO2 increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 Astronauts, Scientists Slam NASA on Man-made Climate Change by Bill Mull</title>
		<link>http://real-agenda.com/2012/04/11/50-astronauts-scientists-slam-nasa-on-man-made-climate-change/#comment-7516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Mull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://real-agenda.com/?p=16655#comment-7516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[97%? wow, what about the other 50%? Help me then. Last year Smithsonian did a fascinating article about a (petrified) tropical swamp uncovered in a coal mine near Chicago. Maybe this indicates that this warming has happened before (maybe many times before) man even arrived on earth. Geologists tell us that the earth had a 10% carbon dioxide atmosphere millions of years before man. How did earth recover?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>97%? wow, what about the other 50%? Help me then. Last year Smithsonian did a fascinating article about a (petrified) tropical swamp uncovered in a coal mine near Chicago. Maybe this indicates that this warming has happened before (maybe many times before) man even arrived on earth. Geologists tell us that the earth had a 10% carbon dioxide atmosphere millions of years before man. How did earth recover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 Astronauts, Scientists Slam NASA on Man-made Climate Change by Kat Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://real-agenda.com/2012/04/11/50-astronauts-scientists-slam-nasa-on-man-made-climate-change/#comment-7512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Donnelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://real-agenda.com/?p=16655#comment-7512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we wait until these NASA scientists are &quot;settled&quot; on the science to do something about Climate Change, our over reliance on fossil fuels, and the fact that we are over burdening the planet&#039;s resources, they will all be dead and their children and grandchildren will be left to pay the consequences.   

I believe it is a mistake to continue to focus on the issue of &quot;Climate Change&quot; as a way to catalyze change.  It is a concept that is wrought with emotion for so many people.  This emotional investment by people means they can&#039;t listen to evidence that goes against their beliefs (a nugget from brain and cognitive science, but perhaps they don&#039;t think that science is &quot;settled&quot; either).  But, think about when you believe passionately about something.  How easy is it for someone to change your mind to the other side?

Instead, what about focusing on the damage that we are doing to our economy and our country&#039;s security by over relying on fossil fuels?  (Can anyone doubt that the Gulf oil spill was an environmental catastrophe?)  

It&#039;s time to wake up and embrace a move into a new era of technology.  I can&#039;t imagine how one could work at NASA for 2, 4, or 40 years and not embrace this kind of technological advancement.  Or, perhaps we should not have continued to innovate on space vehicles? 

Since I don&#039;t know what I don&#039;t know (and neither do these NASA scientists), I prefer to follow the precautionary principle and err on the side of doing something about man made carbon emissions.  Either way, we get rid of toxic pollution and by products, as well as rise up as an innovator and leader again which can only be considered win/win, no matter how you look at it.   Or, we can continue to waste our brain power arguing against Climate Change and watch while China, India, and others take over as the world&#039;s super powers.  

Interestingly, I only see two women on that list (Anita and Grace).  Perhaps the rest of the NASA women care about their children&#039;s and grandchildren&#039;s future well being.  I know that I do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we wait until these NASA scientists are &#8220;settled&#8221; on the science to do something about Climate Change, our over reliance on fossil fuels, and the fact that we are over burdening the planet&#8217;s resources, they will all be dead and their children and grandchildren will be left to pay the consequences.   </p>
<p>I believe it is a mistake to continue to focus on the issue of &#8220;Climate Change&#8221; as a way to catalyze change.  It is a concept that is wrought with emotion for so many people.  This emotional investment by people means they can&#8217;t listen to evidence that goes against their beliefs (a nugget from brain and cognitive science, but perhaps they don&#8217;t think that science is &#8220;settled&#8221; either).  But, think about when you believe passionately about something.  How easy is it for someone to change your mind to the other side?</p>
<p>Instead, what about focusing on the damage that we are doing to our economy and our country&#8217;s security by over relying on fossil fuels?  (Can anyone doubt that the Gulf oil spill was an environmental catastrophe?)  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to wake up and embrace a move into a new era of technology.  I can&#8217;t imagine how one could work at NASA for 2, 4, or 40 years and not embrace this kind of technological advancement.  Or, perhaps we should not have continued to innovate on space vehicles? </p>
<p>Since I don&#8217;t know what I don&#8217;t know (and neither do these NASA scientists), I prefer to follow the precautionary principle and err on the side of doing something about man made carbon emissions.  Either way, we get rid of toxic pollution and by products, as well as rise up as an innovator and leader again which can only be considered win/win, no matter how you look at it.   Or, we can continue to waste our brain power arguing against Climate Change and watch while China, India, and others take over as the world&#8217;s super powers.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, I only see two women on that list (Anita and Grace).  Perhaps the rest of the NASA women care about their children&#8217;s and grandchildren&#8217;s future well being.  I know that I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

