|Sunday, September 24, 2017
You are here: Home » In-depth » The Real causes of Paris Attacks

The Real causes of Paris Attacks 

Terrorist attack

In the wake of the bombings, Barack Obama and François Hollande spoke about hatred towards French values as the cause of the terrorist attacks. This rhetoric is incidentally the same discourse provided by George W. Bush after the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington 14 years ago.

This version of reality was quickly echoed by the corporate and state-sponsored media in the West. Just as it happened on 9/11, the media immediately blamed the “boogieman” of the hour. ISIS, a version of Al-Qaeda on steroids, was automatically blamed for the bombings even before a so-called terrorist incriminated the organization for the attacks.

It took 24 full hours for someone to appear on international television speaking about the real causes of the Paris attacks that killed at least 127 people.

Coercive engineered immigration, intellectual terrorism, and corporate financial terrorism are the top three reasons behind the Paris attack.

For decades, engineered migration as a coercive instrument has been used to destroy western nations.

According to author Kelly M. Greenhill, “engineered migration as a coercive instrument is an extortive variant” of control and “one of the relatively few weapons that weak actors can use to influence the behavior of more powerful states, particularly advanced industrial democracies.” However, in the 21st century, it is the members of a powerful elite the ones sponsoring and promoting engineered migration as a coercive instrument.

Coercive engineered immigration is achieved first through balkanization of third world nations via terror attacks carried out by western intelligence agencies and their proxy terrorist groups. We have seen plenty of this in the Middle East and northern Africa where NATO and the US have been murdering innocent men, women and children for decades.

In addition to murdering innocents, western players have been sponsoring internal wars between religious factions in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen and other countries by providing weapons and in many cases training to bolster civil conflict.

As explained by Kelly M. Greenhill

Coercive engineered migrations (or coercion-driven migrations) are “those cross-border population movements that are deliberately created or manipulated in order to induce political, military and/or economic concessions from a target state or states.”[5] The instruments employed to affect this kind of coercion are myriad and diverse. They run the gamut from compulsory to permissive, from the employment of hostile threats and the use of military force (as were used during the 1967-1970 Biafran and 1992-1995 Bosnian civil wars) through the offer of positive inducements and provision of financial incentives (as were offered to North Vietnamese by the United States in 1954-1955, following the First Indochina War) to the straightforward opening of normally sealed borders.

Coercive engineered migration is a weapon used to force the displacement of millions of people. In the same way in which a pack of wolves scares and separates their pray, the western elite has induced and prevented changes in political behavior by threatening, intimidating, and pressuring smaller and weaker nations with its military force.

This practice has been admitted by U.S. President, Barack Obama, during a VOX interview. Obama said that often times the U.S. needs to twist the arms of non-compliant states.

Intellectual Terrorism

Another cause of the Paris bombings is intellectual terrorism. Intellectual terrorism is often masked as politically correct speech. Intellectual terrorism or politically correct speech is used against anyone who dares to question the official story of any relevant affair. Independent thinkers are quickly labeled as haters, racists, conspiracy theorists or domestic terrorists.

Intellectual terrorism is more visible in Arab dictatorships such as Saudi Arabia and third world nations such as Venezuela, Cuba, and in much of Africa, but it has become part of a new normal in western democracies and North America.

In his book Islam in Contemporary Africa On Violence, Terrorism and Development, author Afis Ayinde Oladosu explains that:

Terrorism usually involves loss of lives. This popular conception of terrorism however does not capture the whole essence of terrorism as there is’ an intellectual dimension to it and this has to do with deliberate attempt to unleash some violence on the human mind thereby exposing it to perpetual degradation which is as injurious as physical violence.

Oladosu adds that intellectual terrorism is a tool of colonialism, the ongoing policy carried out by western nations in Africa, Asia and Latin America. “The economic policy of the colonial powers had an underlying political ideology of appropriating the natural resources of the colonies. This trend is noticeable in the colonial policies of Britain, France, Belgium, Portugal and other colonial powers.” The colonial powers, despite official recognition of independence by many nations, still oppress their former colonies through economic policy.

How can someone identify intellectual terrorism?

Intellectual terrorism may take several forms depending on where it comes from. It can occur in a situation in which academics poison society with toxic values to the detriment of traditional ones. “But the most dangerous form of intellectual terrorism has to do with the connivance of intellectuals with political leaders and government agencies to distort the facts of a situation in the formulation, propagation and implementation of government policies,” says Oladosu. This is the case when intellectuals help in the perpetuation and implementation of oppression and falsehood.

Corporate Financial Terrorism

As pointed out by Edmund Phelps in his article published on The Financial Times, Corporatism, not Capitalism is largely responsible for poverty and inequality. Such poverty and inequality destructive both in developed and developing nations, but their effects are felt even more in poorer nations. Corporate Financial Terrorism is another tool used by the elite to balkanize African and Middle Eastern countries. Along with intellectual terrorism and coercive engineered immigration, Corporate Financial Terrorism is key to bringing about the type of terror attacks seen on Friday in Paris.

Corporate Financial Terrorism is brought upon poor nations via globalization and so-called Free Trade Agreements that only result in more poverty and dependency. Corporations are about profits and lately they have also become strong sponsors of terrorism and financial colonialism via the banking system. Corporations ride the wave of global domination supported by its financial sector. The countries that are the most vulnerable are precisely the ones which are now being bombed by western aggressors.

The corporate system adopted Keynesian economics, falsely identified as neoliberalism -because it is neither new nor liberal- to reconquer their former colonies. This system is based on unregulated economics, the same condition that was true prior to the Great Depression.  Corporate Financial Terrorists have captured governments to serve their criminal agendas.

“Neoliberal globalization changes are brought about through the global corporations whose concerted efforts shape government policies.  Armed with a global financial system and the armies of the NATO member nations, treaties for neoliberal globalization have been signed by the top 100 nations–measured by GDP.  These “free trade” treaties have produced economic monetary crises, declining median income, high unemployment, and ever increasing profits for the global corporations (especially banking).  Quality of life has suffered because there is a basic conflict between UC drive for increasing profits, and that of the public weal,” explains Banking, History & Effects.

The latest bombings in France are the result of a boomerang effect which, in addition to causing terror, also have another outcome: it provides the perfect pretext for more military mobilization of western aggressors who now have a new reason to call for further military action in northern Africa and the Middle East.

What else lurks behind the Paris attacks?

As pointed out by 21CenturyNewswire, “To anyone who is really paying attention, the real agenda behind this ‘terror’ event in Paris – is a NATO-sponsored intervention in Syria and northern Iraq.” Former NATO Commander and US General, Wesley Clark explained the agenda behind the ongoing terrorist campaign carried out by western aggressors.

Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

The Paris attacks have already had the results that would be expected from a clueless western society.  was placed under Martial Law. 1500 soldiers were let loose. Curfew was imposed by the French government and its borders were closed after the bomb attacks. This determinations had hot been implemented since WWII.

In addition to the measures above, France closed one of its Parisian airports. A general state of emergency was immediately declared. Belgium imposes new border controls on its border with France. Illegal searches and seizures were put in place. Schools and Universities closed on Saturday.

Analysts speculated that  may authorise war powers to attack Syria and face the Russia military as a result of the Paris attacks. The media gladly accepted S’s mea culpa in the attacks without questioning how many times do criminals choose to declare their crimes out in the open. But many more questions remain to be answered.

Why is terrorism only shocking when it takes place in Paris, but not when the West terrorises Yemen, Syria or Iraq?

Who funded and trained ISIS? Answering this question would undoubtedly explain who is responsible for the Paris attack.

How is it that the highest security level cannot protect West from terror?

Would withdrawing from war-thorn countries be too little too late?

Wasn’t the violent extremism used in the Paris attacks exported to northern Africa by western imperialists? Isn’t this violent extremism brought  back to bite the western aggressors?

Will France decide to stop using its military to attack other nations and instead use it to defend its borders?

Have terrorists entered Europe via the masses of immigrants that have been let in by European authorities?

Can European States guarantee that terrorists are not coming into the continent among millions of refugees?

How can the most invasive surveillance state in the history of the world not prevent terrorist attacks such as the one in Paris? Is it time to abolish the surveillance apparatus?

Will western powers understand why Russia needs to be supported in Syria and Iraq?

About the author: Luis R. Miranda

Luis Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda News. His career spans over 20 years and almost every form of news media. He writes about environmentalism, geopolitics, globalisation, health, corporate control of government, immigration and banking cartels. Luis has worked as a news reporter, On-air personality for Live news programs, script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news.

Add a Comment