by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
March 2, 2012

Anytime someone dies suddenly in an accident or due to natural causes such a death creates a tsunami that shocks relatives, friends an others. When the person who dies is well-known, the shock extends to the public, just as it happened to Whitney Houston, for example. Some people even take the chance to start rolling out conspiracy theories about the death and its probably causes. In the case of the Andrew Breitbart it is not the exception. In fact, Breitbart’s death is more relevant because of what he had been working on and what he was about to publish.

Mr. Breitbart, it appears, was about to make public videos that contained images of current US president Barack H. Obama. Those videos, insiders say, had compromising information that could even bring down Obama’s 2012 bid for the White House. Unfortunately, Andrew Breitbart died yesterday at the early age of 43 due to natural causes and the information he intended to make public will not be seen, at least for now. Several media outlets report that Mr. Breitbart fell dead at around midnight on February 29 as he was walking around his property in Los Angeles California.

The tapes that Breitbart was supposed to make public referred to Barack Obama’s years in college which apparently contain damaging information. Mr. Breitbart himself confirmed this during a speech at CPAC last month. “The videos are going to come out, the narrative is going to come out, that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails in the 1980s, like Bill (Ayers) and Bernadine (Dohrn), who said one day we would have the presidency, and the rest of us slept as they plotted, and they plotted, and they plotted and they oversaw hundreds of millions of dollars in the Annenberg Challenge and they had real money, from real capitalists. Then they became communists. We got to work on that. That is a parenthesis. Barack Obama is a radical, we should not be afraid to say that! Okay? And Barack Obama was launched from Bill and Bernadine’s salon. I’ve been there.”

According to Andrew Griffin, at Red Tape Report, as it happens often with alternative media and those who are behind them, Breitbart was a conservative who loved individualism and disliked collectivism. That is why he also disliked the Occupy Wall Street movement, because he saw it as a collectivist group. Mr. Griffin, who apparently knew Breitbart says that the man knew he was a major target and that he had many enemies. The list included ACORN and Planned Parenthood, among others. “I am public enemy No. 1 or 2 to the Democratic Party, the progressive movement and the Obama administration based upon the successes my journalism has had,” said Breitbart on a previous interview.

As far as we know, Andrew Breitbart died just hours before the release of the Obama tapes. Previously, Mr. Breitbart hinted that those tapes could be released exactly on March 1. The publication Sinclair News, reported one of Breitbart’s quote regarding these tapes, where he said “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.” Although it is not clear whether he referred to the tapes themselves, what are the chances that he dies on the day he was supposed to release those very same tapes? “I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart at CPAC 2012.

Given the facts presented here, does it take a conspiracy theorist to consider the possibility that Andrew Breitbart was indeed silenced? Will his death scare those who are left at Breitbart Headquarters? Does this mean we’ll never see the supposedly damning tapes?

Even though the media has reported that Breitbart’s cause of death was natural causes, Infowars.com reports that the the Los Angeles County coroner’s office refused to confirm anything until an autopsy is performed.

So, does it mean that there are too many people with too much time out there who are speculating about Andrew Breitbart’s death, Perhaps. But even if he died of a heart attack, as many are already speculating, that does not make his death a natural one. Heart attacks are not naturally occurring events. They are triggered. The reasonable question to ask is, what triggered it? Would it be surprising to discover  that Mr. Breitbart was murdered? No. JFK was killed by his own intelligence agencies. Can there be anything more surprising than that?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

The U.S. Election Fraud evidence the media does not want you to know about

  If there is any hint of honesty in any corner of…

New York is exporting poverty to your community and Di Blasio didn’t tell you

$ 89 million of tax money is spent to send individuals and…