The Earth experienced no warming in the last 17 years and 6 months.
The scientist behind the Gaia theory, James Loveluck already said that environmentalism has become a religion with scientists and alarmists not giving enough attention to the facts.
The facts indeed contradict what the UN and its IPCC, led by climate alarmist Rajendra Pachauri, say is a call for urgent action.
A report released today warns that global warming will cause chaos, even though the data in the report are the same that have been debunked as false in previous reports.
As the graph below shows, there has been no warming since the late 90s.
Others like Maarten van Aalst, a senior official at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent, said: “If we did not cut the greenhouse gases soon, the risks will increase and the risks have already increased.”
The theoretical assumption that greenhouse gases emitted by human activity are the cause of global warming has already been rejected by many independent scientists, with many of them demanding that the IPCC remove their names from reports like the one published today, which has already been megaphoned by the corporate media.
Despite their faulty data, the extremists in the religious environmental movement, increasingly show their insanity. In a recent article, the writer Adam Weinstein, says that “Man-made climate change happens. Man-made climate change kills a lot of people. It’s going to kill a lot more. We have laws on the books to punish anyone whose lies contribute to people’s deaths. It’s time to punish the climate-change liars.”
Weinstein seeks to hide his lack of understanding of climate change and global warming with disinformation to make people believe in the doomsday scenario preached by the apostles of the Church of Extreme Environmentalism. He relies on the ignorance of many people about the clear difference between global warming and climate change and tries to confuse those people with word games.
To begin with, global warming and climate change are two different things, and none of them is caused by human activity. On the one hand, climate change has always happened. It began millions of years before humans appeared on earth, while global warming has never been proven to be related to human activity.
Weinstein publicly asked that everyone who does not agree with the theoretical assumption about climate change to be sent to jail. His proof of global warming is a graph with data from four institutions, all with questionable pasts due to the manipulation of data related to climate change. They are: NASA, the UK Met Office, NOAA, and the Japanese Meteorological Agency. The graph that appears to show data from these four institutions is titled “Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree”. Consensus has been a favorite word for those who wish to quiet down dissent, in order to further the hysteria agenda. See the graph below:
Below this graphic, Weinstein shows a table with a gigantic title on what he thinks are the consequences of global warming, although all his alarming warnings are only assumptions. The table entitled “Climate Change: Recent Impacts”, lists some natural disasters on the left side while on the right side it shows no conclusive evidence, but degrees of likelihood that these natural disasters are caused by what he calls man-made climate change. The likelihoods go from “likely” to “very likely”.
In other words, the best argument of the global warming alarmist crowd is based on probability, not on scientific facts.
Mouth pieces like Gawker.com, where Weinstein published his fictitious article, do not take the time to study real environmental threats that Planet Earth and humanity face, such as Geoengineering through chemical spraying, genetically modified organisms, deadly chemicals in our food supply and the systematic depopulation effort led by the United Nations and its western power members, among others. Why not? Because these are true natural disasters that the corporate controlled media do not want to expose. Why not? Because behind every real environmental threat there is a global corporation harming the environment and with it destroying life on Earth. Besides, it is too difficult and time consuming to conduct the research and objectively analyze the data. It is easier to regurgitate propaganda from corporate-controlled entities that have previously chewed the disinformation for them.