|Saturday, June 6, 2020
You are here: Home » In-depth » The Covid-19 Paradox: Simulation or Reality?

The Covid-19 Paradox: Simulation or Reality? 


The new decade in which we live seems to be moving towards a disastrous social and technological future. The questions that more and more people ask themselves are if life is real or if it is a simulation, and if there is a way to distinguish fact from fiction.

A paradox is a statement or proposition that, despite sounding reasonable, because it is based on acceptable premises, actually leads to a conclusion that seems absurd, logically unacceptable, or self-contradictory.

We live in a simulation, not a real world. What we perceive is a simulation. This is proven by experiments in quantum mechanics. Reality is subjective, not objective, therefore there is no reality but many realities; one for each of us according to what we perceive with our very limited 5 senses and within the visible frequency of the light spectrum. That visible frequency of the spectrum is a very small part of the light spectrum that exists and that our 5 senses cannot see, hear, feel, smell or taste.

In this way, we believe something exists because we can see it, touch it, observe it, smell it or feel it. But what about the rest that we cannot perceive? Does it exist?

If I said that an information network that spreads through the air and that transports ones and zeros, information, video, audio, text, etc., existed, would you believe it? Well, we can’t perceive that network, right? But it exists. It’s called Wi-fi and everyone talks about it. Why then do we believe in its existence? Because of faith? No. Because there are other elements that allow us to reason and believe that this network exists. Those elements are for example the Internet, computers, and of course, what we see on the screens of electronic devices.

Our five senses do not allow us to see Wi-Fi. It could be seen if we used special equipment, but not with our own eyes.

Just like Wi-fi, there are things that are out there that we do not see, touch, feel, hear or taste, but that exist in other realities.

If a tree falls in a forest and we are close to where it falls, we perceive it and that tree, that forest and the noise that the tree makes when falling is real. But if that falling tree is 20 kilometers away, we cannot perceive it, therefore, it is not real, nor is it its fall in the middle of the forest.

I present this example so that before deciding if something exists, or if it is true or not, you take into account that there are many realities beyond what our 5 senses allow us to perceive. Just because we don’t see, touch, smell, hear or taste something doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist. In fact, given the graph in the image below, it is very likely that the unknown does exist given our limited spectrum of perception.

If we remember that in this “physical” world we are only energy, we realize that there are many other forms of energy in our visible spectrum and in others that are invisible to us. If we understand that energy does not disappear, but that it is transformed, we could understand that it is very possible that what we call “reality” is just a simulation of what we perceive.

This is what several scientists, including Dr. Rich Terrile, director of the Center for Evolutionary Computing and Automated Design at NASA’s Propulsion Laboratory, have proposed. Terrile says that “we can all be the creation of a cosmic computer programmer.” Terrile’s version is supported by Bill Hicks, who said that “we are all a subjectively experienced consciousness, there is no death, life is just a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.”

Nick Bostrom, professor of philosophy at Oxford University and director of the Institute for the Future of Humanity shares the same theory. Bostrom has given many Simulation Theory conferences where he states that we can be living in a world made up of digital reality, something like in the movie The Matrix.

Right now, the fastest supercomputers are spinning at about twice the speed of the human brain. If a simple calculation is made using Moore’s Law, that states that computers double their power every two years, it will be found that these supercomputers, within a decade, will have the ability to calculate a full lifespan of 80 years, including every thought conceived in that life in the span of a month.

The reality of the coronavirus

By the way, speaking of imaginary things, has anyone seen evidence that the coronavirus exists? Has anyone isolated the virus from a sample of human tissue and shown it on video, documents or images? Has anyone seen the results of the protocols that must be followed to demonstrate the existence of a pathogen in a sample of human tissue?

In 1890, Dr. Robert Koch, who was also a bacteriologist, developed 4 postulates that have since become the standard for the analysis of a pathogen, and whether this pathogen causes disease. The first postulate is that all patients must have the same symptoms in order to be determined as infected with one single pathogen. The second is that the pathogen must be isolated to prove its existence. The third is that this pathogen must be injected into a living being to prove that it causes a disease; and the fourth, that genetic material must be taken from the living being injected with the pathogen to try to infect another living being to verify that such infection occurred again in another living being.

This process HAS NOT BEEN performed in the analysis of the virus that supposedly causes COVID-19. What the experiments have done is to use human tissue and discover autochthonous genetic material that is well-known to exist in human tissue. The genetic material collected is not making people sick, because it is an integral part of their genetic blueprint. This is why there are so many positive results from evaluations done to purport the evaluation of coronavirus infection. Such a finding does not mean that this virus has been isolated and found to be present in human tissue or to cause COVID-19.

The Chinese were the first to say that thousands of people were getting COVID-19, but their diagnosis was based on symptoms, not on the isolation of the virus and the verification of whether it exists in human tissue according to the postulates previously described.

What are the symptoms used to determine if someone is infected?

Typical symptoms of the common flu, which in many cases makes it practically impossible to detect if the patient has the flu or some other health complication.

After a while, the Chinese began evaluating the existence of COVID-19 with a type of test called RT-PCR, which the United States FDA says is “a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-) test. PCR is used for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in upper and lower respiratory samples, such as nasal swabs, nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, aspirated lower respiratory tract, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nasopharyngeal lavage / aspirate or nasal aspirate, collected from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider.”

The problem with this test is that, according to its creator, Kary Mullis, who produced it in 1994, RT-PCR should not be used to diagnose infectious diseases, because it was not created for that purpose. In addition to not having been created to detect infectious diseases, the RT-PCR test is not capable of determining how much of a suspected pathogen is in a sample of human tissue.

It is important to be clear that for a virus to seriously infect a living being, it needs to be present in gigantic amounts. This has also not been demonstrated by any scientist or doctor, since the test used to carry out the evaluation does not have the capacity to detect the presence of the pathogen, much less to determine the existing quantity.

The result of this situation is that all people who presented symptoms of the common flu began to be diagnosed with COVID-19, due to their symptoms, and not because it is known with certainty that their disease is caused by a virus, or that the virus really exists.

Eventually, the World Health Organization (WHO), which by the way is massively supported by tycoon Bill Gates – the second largest contributor of money to the WHO – gave the alleged virus supposedly causing COVID-19 the role of a pathogen that had begun the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bill Gates is a purported philanthropist who funds research into vaccines for suspected diseases. He also promotes massive vaccination campaigns in third world countries. In 2015, Gates warned that the world would soon suffer from a pandemic of the type that we are supposedly experiencing today. Is Gates a visionary? Perhaps, but it is important to know that Mr. Gates owns a patent for one of the coronavirus strains and is widely promoting the development of a vaccine to inoculate the world population against the supposed virus that is causing COVID-19.

Gates is currently building facilities in different countries to mass-produce coronavirus vaccines. This shows that there is a financial incentive for this supposed pandemic to be accepted as such.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who accompanies Donald Trump at his press conferences, is part of the Leadership Council for the Global Vaccine Action Plan initiated by the Bill Gates and Melinda Gates Foundation. Why would Fauci want the economy to stagnate and the blockade to remain in place? To help his friend Bill sell his miraculous new coronavirus vaccine?

Gates is also known for his agenda to depopulate the planet because according to him, we are overpopulated. Assuming Gates is right about overpopulation, the mass extermination of people with the use of some form of technology, or the simulation of a pandemic to inoculate the world, which would help him achieve his goal to depopulate the planet and earn billions of dollars as a result of this, is absolutely horrendous.

The success of this supposed pandemic relies on the control that those behind this event have of the perception that the masses of people have of it. This process is aided by the media, which obtain a large part of their income from large corporate conglomerates, especially pharmaceutical companies.

So, is COVID-19 a real disease or a perception management event controlled by those who produce it to justify a depopulation or mass vaccination agenda?

Let us remember that many of our individual and constitutional rights have been violated as a consequence of the supposed COVID-19 pandemic event. Governments have limited freedom of movement, lawful gatherings, and even freedom of expression, in order to protect us all from COVID-19. Everything from acquiring debt to coping with rising unemployment and a declining economy to limiting what we read has been restricted.

The so-called coronavirus has helped to affirm the power of the elite that governs the planet. A supposed virus that came from an unknown place has justified and apparently given legitimacy to national governments, which, working in the service of the elite, have imposed unconstitutional and illegal measures to accelerate the implementation of a system of total centralized control.

We are told that all this is done for the “common good”. It is done to stop the pandemic, they tell us. It is done so that we can return to normality; whatever that means, as soon as possible.

But when is “as soon as possible”?

What will that normality be? Will it be a new normal with significant changes? Is it the old normal?

Corporations and “philanthropists” are already preparing to bring us “solutions” to the problem. PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION. Apple and Google offer us an app to spy on us at all times under the excuse that we need to be monitored to know where we are and whether we represent a threat to the rest of the population, should we be infected with COVID-19.

The solution presented by some politicians and doctors is to obligate people to hold an immunity card that will be given only to those who get a vaccine. Only they could eventually go out of their homes, work and receive help from the State. The rest of us who do not comply will have to stay at home, unable to work and confined until they say when to let us out.

The electromagnetic soup

One thing that is certain is that we live in a world bombarded by radio frequencies of various magnitudes, a radiation soup that attacks us every day. Right now, Elon Musk is placing satellites at low altitudes in the atmosphere to radiate the planet with 5G frequencies. Musk wants to put 42,000 satellites into the atmosphere in the near future.

Why is it important to know this?

Because radiation emitted by 5G technology, at 60 Ghz, which will be necessary to create the so-called Smart Cities, and then the so-called Internet of Things, absorbs oxygen in the air at a rate of 98%. And why is this important? Because when oxygen is absorbed, it disappears from the air and therefore prevents the respiratory needs of humans from being met.

The effect of oxygen absorption by the energy emitted by the 5G signal is even greater at ground level, where humans live. In addition to oxygen, the main molecules absorbed include H2O, CO2 and O3.

What does the radiation emitted by 5G technology have to do with the coronavirus? It is not simply a conspiracy theory. Doctors who have analyzed the human tissue of the lungs of victims of the alleged COVID-19, describe the state of the lungs as inflamed tissue with multiple samples of blood coagulation, and in their own description, it seems as if the oxygen had been sucked of their blood and their organisms.

Put simply, the lungs appear to have suffered from oxygen depravation, which, not surprisingly, would cause suffocation for a person who relies on this gas for survival. This observation seems to coincide with the explanation given above about how oxygen interacts with the 5G frequency at 60Ghz, making it impossible for people to inhale the oxygen they need to live.

It is important to remember that the countries with the largest number of sick and dead patients, who were allegedly victims of COVID-19, such as the United States, Italy and Spain, are on the list of those that have deployed 5G technology in large cities, where population density is higher. The opposite has happened in countries where there is little use of 5G technology in Africa and proportionally in Latin America.

Studies have shown that from a bioelectromagnetic point of view, humans have never been exposed to radiation in the 60 GHz band, because these frequencies, which correspond to the peak of molecular oxygen absorption, are highly attenuated in the atmosphere.

The absorption of oxygen by the 60 GHz millimeter waves basically osculates and prevents the body from absorbing oxygen. The symptoms of this are what we saw in Wuhan, where people began to fall to the ground in the middle of the street. The same has been seen in countries like Ecuador in South America.

The damage that 5G technology does to humans is something that has been described recently. Doctors from all over the world have denounced the damage that this technology has on humans and have described it that way.

“The launch of 5G is absolutely insane,” says Dr. Martin Pall addressing the NIH.

“Allowing this technology to be used without proving its safety is extremely foolhardy, as millimeter waves are known to have a profound effect on all parts of the human body,” says Professor Trevor Marshall, Director of the Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California.

“Plans to emit highly penetrating millimeter-wave 5G radiation from space must surely be one of the greatest follies ever conceived by humanity. There will be no safe place to live,” said Olga Sheean, a former WHO employee and author from No Safe Place.

Like them, scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from various countries are calling for an urgent stop to the deployment of 5G, which includes radiation from space satellites.

5G will vastly increase exposure to this kind of radiation in addition to 2G, 3G and 4G telecommunication networks. Radiofrequency has been shown to be harmful to humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G is an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.

The effects that 5G radiation has on humans with acute and chronic health problems, include life-threatening diseases such as cancer, heart disease, type-2 diabetes and mental disorders such as depression, anxiety and increased suicidal tendencies.

There are also major organizations that warn of the dangers presented by 5G. The international call to stop 5G on Earth and in space had approximately 31,300 signatories as of January 11, 2019.

Meanwhile, governments work together to advance the agenda of those who rule the planet, several levels above them. The alleged COVID-19 pandemic is an example of this, regardless of the way in which it is being carried out.

NOTE: This article is not intended to tell you what to think or what to believe, but to provide you with information that cannot be obtained in traditional media so that you can make your own conclusion.

Is COVID-19 real or not? This will depend on your perception of reality. I would not blame you if you conclude that reality closely resembles fiction.

Who decides on human life, on controlling it or eliminating it?

Leave your comment below.

Many people like you read and support The Real Agenda News’ independent, journalism than ever before. Different from other news organisations, we keep our journalism accessible to all.

The Real Agenda News is independent. Our journalism is free from commercial, religious or political bias. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. Editorial independence is what makes our journalism different at a time when factual, honest reporting is lacking elsewhere.

In exchange for this, we simply ask that you read, like and share all articles. This support enables us to keep working as we do.

About the author: Luis R. Miranda

Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder & editor of The Real Agenda News. His career spans over 23 years in every form of news media. He writes about environmentalism, education, technology, science, health, immigration and other current affairs. Luis has worked as on-air talent, news reporter, television producer, and news writer.

Response to The Covid-19 Paradox: Simulation or Reality?

  1. MICHAEL D'ALESSIO

    thank you for this article it is a great read and you raise some thoght provocating points keep up the good work of informing people because if we leave to mainstream media that would never happen ” the truth is learned never told”
    peace love and happiness

Add a Comment