International, Clandestine Weather Modification Program is a Fact. The Weather is Being traded in the Stock Market
ALIX LONGMAN & OLGA RAFFA | THE REAL AGENDA | AUGUST 27, 2012
Continues from Page 2…
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS AGAINST ANTHROPOGENIC AIR POLLUTION AND WEATHER MODIFICATION
- (CLRTAP) – ‘Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution’ –
CLRTAP OPENED FOR SIGNATURE IN 1979 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON MARCH 16, 1983. THE UNITED STATES BECAME A PARTY TO THE CONVENTION IN 1979.(THE UK HAS ALSO ENTERED INTO THIS CONVENTION) CONTRACTING PARTIES COMMIT THEMSELVES TO LIMITING, AND TO GRADUALLY PREVENTING AND REDUCING THEIR DISCHARGES OF AIR POLLUTANTS AND THUS TO COMBATING THE RESULTING TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION. LONG-RANGE TRANSBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION IS DEFINED BY THE CONVENTION AS THE HUMAN INTRODUCTION OF SUBSTANCES OR ENERGY INTO THE AIR WHICH HAVE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON HUMAN HEALTH, THE ENVIRONMENT, OR MATERIAL PROPERTY IN ANOTHER COUNTRY, AND FOR WHICH THE CONTRIBUTION OF INDIVIDUAL EMISSION SOURCES OR GROUPS OF SOURCES CANNOT BE DISTINGUISHED
- (ENMOD) -1976 Environmental Modification Treaty –
Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques
The film “An Inconvenient Truth” was a convenient lie – “using a biased presentation to exploit the fears of the public for political gain” and “a blatant intellectual fraud” now used to misinform an entire generation –
– As part of a nationwide “Sustainable Schools Year of Action” launched in late 2006, the UK Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Scottish Executive announced between January–March 2007 that copies of An Inconvenient Truth would be sent to all secondary schools in England, Wales and Scotland. The film was placed into the science curriculum for fourth and sixth-year students in Scotland as a joint initiative between Learning and Teaching Scotland and ScottishPower.
Public awareness of SAG has been deliberately suppressed and now manipulated.
The recent Royal Society funded Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI) indict themselves about the deliberate manipulation of the public in their own notes –
“P – Involve general public because a) they pay for it, b) they have the power to stop it. Keep them informed on what GE (geoengineering) is for, but don’t necessarily ask their permission.” (see screenshot below taken from here.
Professor David Keith, employed by the Royal Society and whose company, ‘Carbon Engineering’ is privately funded by Tar Sands magnate, Murray Edwards and endorsed by Richard Branson, spoke in the hypothetical about the proposed use of SRM on Hard Talk (BBC) on 16-11-11 –
“What’s unusual and SCARY is that with tiny amounts of money and effort we can directly alter the climate by putting these reflective particles in the stratosphere and that has profound implications right up to geo-political implications.” He said it raises “security” and “governance challenges”. When asked how it can work whether it is feasible, how much it costs, is SRM (Solar Radiation Management) the path which looks as if it is viable at the moment – he answered ‘no’..
A later slip of the tongue had Mr Keith unwittingly confirming he did not approve any public action of these programs – “I am happy to see PRIVATE action on cutting emissions by making solar power, more electric vehicles or capture from air – I’m NOT happy to see PUBLIC action on technologies where there’s huge leverage by putting particles in the stratosphere” He also admitted, “People should be concerned about cheap technologies that can manipulate the entire planet’s climate” Mr Keith goes on to describe the alleged ‘proposed’ SRM technique that is actually already in full operation saying – “You could use aircraft to deliver tonnes or literally MILLIONS of TONNES of very small particles into the upper atmosphere (– irrefutable similarity to the Welsbach patent)
THE PUBLIC ARE NOT HAPPY ABOUT ANYTHING BEING SPRAYED ON THEM – NOT EVEN WATER
When the recent Stratospheric Injection for Climate Engineering project (SPICE) attempted using an SRM technique purportedly only injecting water into the atmosphere, the public reaction was not supportive of even water being sprayed into the atmosphere (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7399/full/485415a.html) It can surely be assumed as a given the public would not support anything else being sprayed if they were fully informed.
NO permission regarding weather modification has EVER been requested of the public therefore NO permission has ever been given in ANY country.. so NO organisation NOR government NOR private individual has a legal right to be doing this – yet this has gone ahead anyway – and therefore is a violation of human rights. (Dr Ilya – This is inescapable abuse )
FOLLOW THE MONEY –
As is blatantly apparent with David Keith and Ken Caldeira’s financial backing from private individuals such as Bill Gates and Richard Branson, so it is that all government/university science is in truth privately funded and therefore has an agenda – AGENDA 21 to be precise – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3qW2XJZdSA&feature=related– which is NOT in any way shape or form in the public interest. To help this along, all environmental groups have been manipulated to depend on perpetuating the lie of global warming to sustain their own funding and survival. This article clearly explains the reason – The Great Riddle: Greenpeace and the Chemtrail Question (http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/r+z-gp.html – footnotes)
The ETC (http://www.etcgroup.org) group said “Rich governments (and wealthy individuals) are hoping for quick fixes rather than risk inconveniencing their electorate or offending industry” stating that “A moratorium on real-world geoengineering experimentation is urgent. Additionally, the CBD, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and / or the UN General Assembly should seek the advice of the International Court of Justice to confirm that geoengineering experimentation would be a violation of the 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD).
Any and all gatherings of nations’ leading organisations should tackle head-on the governance of geoengineering as well as the evaluation of other new and emerging technologies that pose grave threats to the environment and to the hundreds of millions (99%) of people who depend upon its health for their livelihoods vs the very few (1%) depending on the perpetuation of geoengineering for their indulgence.
THE LIE OF THE GLOBAL WARMING JUGGERNAUT NOW BEING USED TO JUSTIFY SRM USING S.A.I. MUST CEASE IMMEDIATELY
The Climate Change: Climate Engineering Research Under Review at Copenhagen Consensus 2012 exploration of global policy (dated 5/4/2012) sought to answer the question – “If the global community wants to spend up to, say, $75 billion over the next four years to do most good for the world, which solutions would yield the greatest net benefits?”
Despite global warming having been exposed as a lie, the answer was – “It would appear that only rapid, repeated, large-scale deployment of potent, shortwave, geoengineering options (e.g., stratospheric aerosols) could conceivably cool the climate to near its pre-industrial state on the 2050 timescale.” Once commenced, termination is unlikely – “For two reasons, once SRM starts, there will be strong incentives to continue it.
First, termination would be unlikely just because it would be costly. Second, as interest groups organize around existing programs, government policy often develops strong path dependence. In sum, SRM is a family of technologies that could offer immense benefits. The proposed research program is inexpensive, a small fraction of current climate science R&D spending and the CC12 budget. The time has come to begin researching this approach to dealing with climate change.”
The ENTIRE GREEN INDUSTRY risks implosion for the very same financial reasons when the lie is fully exposed.
From “The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering “ – by Marlos Goes · Nancy Tuana · Klaus Keller
“Aerosol geoengineering not carefully balanced by CO2 abatement constitutes a conscious temporal risk transfer that arguably violates the principle of intergenerational justice. Substituting aerosol geoengineering for greenhouse gas emissions abatements constitutes a conscious risk transfer to future generations, in violation of principles of intergenerational justice which demands that present generations should not create benefits for themselves in exchange for burdens on future generations.”
DDT – A REMINDER – THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE –
In 1962 of Rachel Carson’s classic Silent Spring, which described the results of the misuse of Monsanto’s manufactured DDT and other pesticides. In the fable that began that volume, she wrote: “It was a spring without voices. On the mornings that had once throbbed with the dawn chorus of robins, catbirds, doves, jays, wrens, and scores of other bird voices there was now no sound; only silence lay over the fields and woods and marsh.”
Silent Spring was heavily attacked by the pesticide industry and by narrowly trained entomologists, but its scientific foundation has stood the test of time. Misuse of pesticides is now widely recognized to threaten not only bird communities but human communities as well. The very same makers of this pesticide –Monsanto – have now geo-engineered ‘aluminium-resistant’ seeds that places like Hawaii now have to purchase due to the elevated levels of aluminium in the fallout from chemtrails.
“With his “SE-5” plus radioanalysis machine, Idaho Observer subscriber, Max Willard, 67, of Roseville, Calif., found that chemtrails over his hometown contained a variety of contaminants that include DDT, hepatitis B, anthrax, DDT, and several varieties of flu and viruses associated with AIDS.” http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=102459.0
“Denial is a very powerful human emotion. In the hustle and bustle (now quite out of hand, for reflective time), how many people look up at the sky? It also takes huge courage, a very deep, internal willingness to examine politically motivated corporate controlled media spin, and search for the real answers. Humans like their regular routines. To re-examine what we think we know, based on new evidence, takes a willingness to think outside the proverbial box; to want to find out the truth –not the pervasive Orwellian doublespeak that pervades our society. If everything in our daily routine belies what is truly going on, it requires fortitude (and a dedication to integrity) to explore the unknown – to question the litany.” Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
If you do not prioritise truth and heart over opportunism, the following is likely to be ignored – but if you do, please attend to this directive and reconnect to your heart and conscience to act on this most urgent of all our UK community’s priorities.