American Medical Association will force people to take experimental Vaccines
October 26, 2012
Freedom of choice when it comes to injecting — or not — a poisonous vaccine may be a thing of the past if the AMA has its way.
By CHRISTINA ENGLAND | VACTRUTH | OCTOBER 26, 2012
The American Medical Association (AMA) recently published a paper proposing the introduction of a new law to force you and your children into experimental vaccine trials against your wishes. Your only way out of this directive would be to sign an ‘opt out form.’
In January, the AMA published a paper by Susanne Sheehy, BM BCh, MRCP, DTM&H, and Joel Meyer, BM BCh, MRCP on the ‘Virtual Mentor’ website, stating that there has been a steady decline in the numbers of healthy volunteers willing to participate in clinical trials. 
The AMA believes that more people should want to help in the development of new vaccinations. They stated:
“Reasons for this decline are unclear but are likely to be multifaceted. One familiar problem is the payment of volunteers. To date, the relatively meager compensation that participants often receive could be seen to belittle and undervalue the contribution of these individuals to global health.”
VOLUNTEER PARTICIPATION TO BECOME A THING OF THE PAST
Because of the decline in willing volunteers, the AMA has decided that volunteer participation in vaccination trials should become a thing of the past. They said:
“If progression of promising vaccines from the lab to the clinic is to remain unaffected and financial inducement is an ethically unacceptable solution to the recruitment shortage, other strategies need to be considered. Compulsory involvement in vaccine studies is one alternative solution that is not as outlandish as it might seem on first consideration. Many societies already mandate that citizens undertake activities for the good of society; in several European countries registration for organ-donation has switched from “opt-in” (the current U.S. system) to “opt out” systems (in which those who do not specifically register as non-donors are presumed to consent to donation, and most societies expect citizens to undertake jury service when called upon.”
That’s right; according to the AMA we should all sign ‘opt out’ forms if we do not want to participate in vaccination trials. If, for some reason, we should forget to do this, then we should automatically be classified as giving passive consent!
In my opinion, agreeing to be a guinea pig for a vaccination trial is a little different from undertaking jury service, whether it is for the good of society or not. As for organ donation, there is one small fact the AMA appears to have forgotten; when our organs are taken, we are already dead!
I say this because a paper released fresh off the press makes abundantly clear just how catastrophic mistakes can be when vaccinations are fast-tracked onto the market.
PROOF OF WHAT WE ALREADY KNEW
The paper, written by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic and Dr. Chistopher Shaw from the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, states:
“In the past several decades, there have been numerous studies and case reports documenting neurological and autoimmune adverse reactions (ADRs) following the use of various vaccines. Arthritis, vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), encephalopathy, neuropathy, seizure disorders and autoimmune demyelinating disease syndromes are the most frequently reported serious adverse events.” 
The paper goes on to describe serious errors in the HPV vaccine Gardasil’s safety trials, which they say shows evidence of significant flaws in study design, data reporting and interpretation. They believe this has led to the death and injury of many young women.
Dr. Tomljenovic and Dr. Shaw have found the following alarming results after studying the brain samples of two young women who died shortly after they were administered with the Gardasil vaccination:
“In both cases, the autopsy revealed no anatomical, microbiological nor toxicological findings that might have explained the death of the individuals. In contrast, our IHC analysis showed evidence of an autoimmune vasculitis potentially triggered by the cross-reactive HPV-16L1 antibodies binding to the wall of cerebral blood vessels in all examined brain samples. We also detected the presence of HPV-16L1 particles within the cerebral vasculature with some HPV-16L1 particles adhering to the blood vessel walls. HPV-18L1 antibodies did not bind to cerebral blood vessels nor any other neural tissues. IHC also showed increased T-cell signalling and marked activation of the classical antibody-dependent complement pathway in cerebral vascular tissues from both cases. This pattern of complement activation in the absence of an active brain infection indicates an abnormal triggering of the immune response in which the immune attack is directed towards self-tissue.”
Bearing this knowledge in mind makes a mockery of the AMA’s belief that we should offer ourselves willingly as guinea pigs for vaccination experiments.
THE AMA WANTS YOU … FOR DEADLY DISEASES!
If all this is a little hard to believe, the AMA goes on to state:
“Society is unlikely to accept compulsory recruitment to a trial for a vaccine against the common cold if the vaccine causes severe complications in vaccinees. Increase the severity of the disease in question, however, and compulsory recruitment becomes a more palatable option.”
Unbelievable! The AMA is actually naïve enough to believe that society will be more willing to be used as guinea pigs in their vaccination trials, if the trials are for deadly diseases!
In my opinion, members of society are highly unlikely to be too keen to offer themselves up as human sacrifices in the pharmaceutical industry’s sick experiments, whether the experiments are for deadly diseases or not. I believe that society will more likely remember past vaccine trial disasters and turn around and run in the opposite direction as fast as they can.
WHAT THE AMA FORGOT TO INCLUDE IN THEIR PAPER
In the same month that the AMA proposed compulsory involvement in experimental vaccination trials, GlaxoSmithKline Argentina Laboratories Company was fined 400,000 pesos by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky following a report issued by the National Administration of Medicine, Food and Technology (ANMAT in Spanish) for irregularities during lab vaccine trials conducted between 2007 and 2008 that allegedly killed 14 babies. 
Hardly a glowing recommendation, is it? The deaths of these innocent young babies represent only a small fraction of the adverse reactions and deadly mistakes suffered by children and adults around the world who have participated in experimental vaccine trials.
EVEN MORE VACCINE TRIAL BLUNDERS
In 1991, The Chicago Tribune reported that during vaccine trials for the AIDS vaccine in Paris, at least three people died from adverse reactions out of the 19 participants that took part. 
According to The Tribune, these deaths were not reported to any medical journals or to the French and American authorities that sanctioned the experiments. The Tribune said:
“When the French and American scientists collaborating in the experiment published an account of their research last year, they reported that there had been no deaths among the subjects. At the time the article appeared, two of the subjects had died.
The vaccine experiment continued despite the deaths. French government records show that, nearly three months after the first volunteer died, the study was expanded to include more subjects.”
In 2008, The Telegraph reported that three Polish doctors and six nurses were facing criminal prosecution after a number of homeless people died following medical trials for a vaccine to combat the H5N1 bird-flu virus.  The Telegraph reported:
“The medical staff from the northern town of Grudziadz, are being investigated over medical trials on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.
Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be tested with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but, according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.”
In 2011, The Independent reported that pharmaceutical industries were exploiting the illiterate, the poor and the ill by signing them up to drug trials without their consent.  It was alleged that between 2007 and 2010 1,730 people died in India during such trials. These trials included:
- The recruitment of hundreds of tribal girls without parental consent for an immunization study sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on the nod of the warden of their government hostel. Several girls subsequently died. The study was later halted by the federal authorities.
- The use by drug companies of survivors of the world’s worst poisonous gas disaster in Bhopal as “guinea pigs” in at least 11 trials without proper informed consent.
- The completion by doctors at a government hospital in Indore, located in central India, of dozens of private trials that a police investigation found “violated the ethical guidelines.” The doctors who conducted the trials decided that not one of 81 cases in which a participant suffered an adverse effect was linked to the treatment. New trials were stopped while the state government investigated. A whistle-blower was fired.
ANOTHER (LIABILITY) FREE PASS FOR BIG PHARMA
Of course, it is unlikely that the pharmaceutical industries will ever be brought to justice for their crimes against society because on February 22, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court shielded drug companies from all liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by government when companies could have produced a safer vaccine. 
This basically means that any drug company selling vaccinations in America cannot be held accountable by a jury, in a court of law, if those vaccines give us brain damage but could have been made less toxic. In other words, if you or your child becomes permanently disabled or autistic after receiving a vaccine mandated by the government you are on your own. 
It appears that pharmaceutical industries, medical professionals and government agencies have little regard for human life or indeed human suffering when it comes to vaccines. Their multi-billion dollar industry must go on at all costs. Whether it is the homeless, the poor or the vulnerable, they will exploit them and kill them without so much as a backwards glance.
If the AMA gets their way, then it will not be long before you or your child could be included into vaccination trials, if you have not signed an ‘opt out form.’ This means that if your child comes home with a form scrunched up at the bottom of their school bag and you do not find it, or if you forget to sign it, then the drug company will classify your absent-mindedness as passive consent and your child will be used as a pharmaceutical industry guinea pig.
- Virtual Mentor Susanne Sheehy, BM BCh, MRCP, DTM&H, and Joel Meyer, BM BCh, MRCP – Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated? http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pfor1-1201.html
- Lucija Tomljenovic and Christopher Shaw – Death After Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Casual or Coincidental? http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/ArchivePROA/articleinpressPROA.php
- Buenos Aires Herald – GSK Fined Over Vaccine Trials; 14 Babies Reported Dead http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/88922/gsk-lab-fined-$1m-over-tests-that-killed-14–babies
- Chicago Tribune – 3 Dead In Aids Vaccine Tests http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-04-14/news/9102030245_1_vaccine-experiment-vaccinia-disease-aids-vaccine-tests
- The Telegraph – Homeless People Die After Bird Flu Vaccine Trial in Poland http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-after-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.html
- The Independent – Without Consent: How Drug Companies Exploit Indian ‘Guinea Pigs’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/without-consent-how-drugs-companies-exploit-indian-guinea-pigs-6261919.html
- Supreme Court of the United States. Russell Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al No. 09-152. Argued October 12, 2010 – Decided February 22, 2011. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf
- Natural Health Strategies – No Pharma Liability for Vaccine Damages:
Supreme Court http://www.naturalhealthstrategies.com/pharma-liability.html