A Pandemic of Corruption, not H1N1
June 7, 2010
Dr. Margaret Chan standing next to the WHO's flag bearing the Caduceus.
By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
June 7, 2010
There is no need to say it; it is almost redundant and repetitive to tell about the corruption that brought about the H1N1 false alarm last year. However, it is never excessive to point out massive corruption when it is detected and identified so clearly. Many independent sources have denounced the corruption that runs rampant in the World Health Organization. One of them, the European Health Council, studied and published a report that revealed the gigantic corruption scheme within the WHO and between its workers and the pharmaceutical industry.
Now it is the turn of the British Medical Journal to denounce and publish its findings. The highlight of the report states that highly positioned scientists who ‘convinced’ the heads of the WHO to declare the pandemic, held tight financial relationships with the pharmaceutical companies that loaded up their coffers with the sale of the vaccines. The WHO scientists received direct financial compensation from the vaccine manufacturers. During and after the fallout, the WHO denied requests to disclose information on conflicts of interests between its top advisers and the drug companies.
Perhaps the biggest victim after the thousands of patients who died of the side effects the vaccine produced, those suffer from irreparable neurological disorders -also as a consequence of the vaccine- and others who will die and get sick in the future, is the WHO itself. The very little credibility it still held has completely dissipated and nothing that comes out of its loudspeakers can be trusted. Now, the only way the organization -a branch of the United Nations- can enforce any of its maddening policies is through the puppet governments that follow any of the guidelines it may issue in the coming months and years.
* The Caduceus is an appropriate choice to represent modern medicine. In antiquity, it was the guide of the dead and protector of merchants, shepherds, gamblers, liars and thieves.
The findings revealed by Deborah Cohen, editor at the BMJ, and Philip Carter, a journalist who works for the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London, were not only not denied by the head of the WHO, Dr Margaret Chan, but also defended and justified. Chan said the secrecy was necessary to protect the integrity and independence of the members while doing critical work and also to ensure transparency. In other words, it is not necessary to carry out honest work at the World Health Organization so long people do not suspect or discover corruption. However, if corruption is discovered, it is absolutely fine to cover it up while the WHO investigates itself to determine if there is or not wrongdoing in its operations.
The British Medical Journal is not the only organization that found corruption at the heart of the WHO. As mentioned before, the European Health Council’s investigation also determined that the declaration of the H1N1 Pandemic was based on politics and not science. It says the way in which the WHO handled the supposed pandemic was “a waste of large sums of public money, and also unjustified scares and fears about health risks faced by the European public at large.”
The reaction from the pharmaceutical industrial complex could not come fast enough. The drug lords said the WHO did not have other option but to declare the pandemic due to the fact vaccines are the only ways to prevent and cure disease. This of course are lies. Vaccines do not treat or cure disease; they prolong them and produce them. On the other hand, natural production of vitamin D3, for example, is a proven way to prevent and cure disease such as Influenza and others like cancer more effectively than any vaccine ever could. How many times do you hear any doctor or WHO scientist recommending a patient to take sunlight so the body can produce the necessary vitamin D or D3? The answer is never. The reason for that is that both the pharmaceutical industry and the WHO pretend to perpetuate the sick care programs that currently have more people than ever in drugs. Anyone heard of drug or pharmaceutical dependency?
Studies in North America, South America and Europe have shown that a 40-60 nanograms of serum per mililiter hydroxyvitamin D (100-150 nanomols per liter) of blood is lethal to disease, including 10 different kinds of cancer, diabetes and of course influenza. The details of the studies and what Vitamin D and D3 are capable of doing to prevent disease as well as to decrease the chance of many medical problems to recur, can be seen here. So one of the keys to prevent disease is to find out what’s the level of serum in your blood, and to intake vitamin D or D3 if there is a deficiency. The cost can vary from free (exposure to sunlight 10-15 minutes a day between 11 am and 1 pm when there is less UVB radiation) to about five cents of a dollar a day (using supplements). Don’t let any doctor confuse you with “no one knows what is the right dosage of vitamin D”, because that is exactly the wrong question to ask or try to answer. But if you are someone who feels more comfortable with measuring your daily intake, 2000 IU per day is a recommended dosage. Again, the details can be seen in the video cited above.
As Mike Adams writes “People were kept ignorant of natural remedies, in other words, to make sure more people died and a more urgent call for mass vaccination programs could be carried out. A few lives never gets in the way of Big Pharma profits, does it?”. That is exactly my point, too. A few thousand lives don’t mean anything to an industry whose only goal is to profit every single year based on lies, scare tactics and corruption. This is precisely what Dr. Margaret Chan meant with her statement. Corruption is tolerated. Experimenting with humans is all right. Looting the public coffers is also fine. And when people find out the lies, they themselves decide whether there was wrongdoing or not.
But how is it that the World Health Organization mixes, brews and carries out the corruption cocktail we are talking about?
Over-blow the supposed risk: The WHO and pharmaceutical companies classify the risk as very high and create imaginative levels of chance of mortality. This time, the WHO created a 6th stage which it then declared we were all in. At this time, when very few cases of H1N1 had been confirmed around the planet, the simple intake of Vitamin D and D3 -either through sunlight or supplements- would have done away with the virus.
Demand that nations purchase vaccines: The WHO asked and then demanded that countries bought vaccines from the biggest manufacturing houses: Sanofi and Glaxosmithkline; in order to prepare for the supposed pandemic. They then raised the risk level to one of “public health emergency”, which made the countries carry out massive vaccination campaigns against the unsuspecting public.
Loot the public coffers: Nations -both in developed and underdeveloped regions of the world- spent billions of dollars purchasing H1N1 vaccines while the virus never even reached a significant level of risk. As it turned out, what did get indeed gigantic was the bank accounts of the pharmaceutical companies as they collected the money.
Payoffs to corrupt scientists: While the world was falling victim of the panic and interacting with anyone on the street was seen as risky, -masks popping out everywhere- scientists at the WHO pocketed kickbacks from the pharmaceutical manufacturers. Those monies were intentionally kept secret; as the head of the WHO, Dr. Margaret Chan admitted.
Instigate and increase fear: As a way to keep the profits from the sale of vaccines growing, the WHO as well as national and local health departments called on people to vaccinate themselves and their relatives. Vaccinating, they said, was the only way to be saved from the deadly H1N1 virus. How many of the people who allegedly died from H1N1 died due to the virus? Very few. Most of them died of health complications related to previous medical problems that were aggravated with the influenza virus. The vaccine did not prevent or treat those complications. In fact, many of them were triggered by the vaccines themselves.
The question that comes to mind then is: Why do governments and its health departments continue to follow guidelines from the WHO given the blatant corruption schemes that govern its actions? And more important: Will they continue to obey the directives from the WHO in the future? Probable yes. Bureaucracy is an equal opportunity offender and it does not distinguish whether it is a local, regional, national or international organ. So the decision to reject the WHO’s corrupted rules and to take responsibility for your health is in your hands. So when the next ‘pandemic’ comes around remember: The scientists that advice the WHO are in the payroll of the pharmaceutical companies and they will always hype a virus and turn it into a monster with 5 heads if that is what it takes for them to turn a profit. And one more thing: there has never been an independent scientific study that confirmed that vaccines prevent, treat or cure any disease. Vaccines are the biggest scam of modern medicine. All medical studies carried out which claim that a vaccine prevents, treats or cures disease were either conducted by vaccine manufacturers or paid by them so universities and laboratories “independently confirmed” they are effective.
If there is anything positive left from the WHO’s imaginary H1N1 pandemic is that now more than ever we can be sure neither the WHO nor the pharmaceutical industrial complex have your interests at heart. Their only interests revolve around the idea of filling their pockets with money and in the process depopulate the planet a little bit more every time.
me explicar como iria surgir e quem a controlaria. A resposta a estas questões já estão claras. Dominic Strauss-Kahn respondeu às minhas questões de infância. Uma moeda global gerida por um Banco Central Global. O chefe do FMI disse que isto é necessário durante uma reunião na qual reafirmou sua opinião de que esta crise é uma “oportunidade.”
r cómo surgiría y quién la controlaría. La respuesta a estas preguntas ya están claras. Dominic Strauss-Kahn, respondió a mis preguntas de infancia. Una moneda mundial administrada por un banco central global. El jefe del FMI dijo que esto era necesario en Zürich, Suiza, durante una reunión en la que confirmó su opinión de que esta crisis “es una oportunidad”.
would come about or who would control it. The answer to those questions are now clear. Dominic Strauss-Kahn answered my childhood questions. A Global Currency managed by a Global Central Bank. The IMF chief said so in Zürich, Switzerland, during a meeting in which he confirmed his view that this crisis “is an opportunity”.
