Oslo Terror Attack has False-flag Tones

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 24, 2011

As the Real Agenda warned on Thursday, the likelihood of a false-flag terror attack was ever more possible than in the last few years. In our article published on Thursday July 21, we focused attention on a new video put out by the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA in the United States which specifically pointed to white or caucasian males as potential threats for terrorism. In the video, both organizations portrayed white men dropping off car bombs in a federal building and activating explosives on a street somewhere.

What are the chances that the very next day, a supposed white terrorist attacked a government building in Oslo, Norway? What are the chances that the alleged bomber used one of the two methods showed in the Homeland Security video? What are the chances that it was a white male with Christian Conservative beliefs?

One only needs to take a look at the history and the main traits that past terrorist attacks had and compare them to the bomb attack in Oslo, but that could have occurred anywhere else in the world. First of all, the main stream media rapidly came out blaming muslim extremists for the attack to later change their story and blame “white” Al-Qaeda for the attacks in Oslo and Utoya.

Another part that coincides with other false-flag attacks is that the supposed perpetrator is presented as acting alone, and when the fake public relations media stories fail to convince the public, new details are added to make the story live for another day. Now, police say they have a second man in custody who supposedly acted together with Anders Behring Breivik to carry out both attacks. The same lone patsy scheme was offered by authorities during the Oklahoma City bombing and the World Trade Center attack in 1993.

Another piece of information that does not make sense is that the terrorist attack happened on a holiday, when most government workers were not at their desks. Why would a terrorist take the time and work to carry out an attack and make it happen during a holiday? Why would a terrorist group attack a mostly empty building on a holiday? Oslo’s bomb blast comes in times of economic hardship in Europe while the government is experiencing low levels of approval from the public and after Norway announced the withdrawal of its troops from the NATO force that is bombing Libya and other countries in Africa.

Anders Behring Breivik is a white caucasian of 32 years of age, who calls himself a Christian Conservative and as some reports rumor, a Freemason. Nothing against freemasons here. No way though, a “lone wolf” killed 92 people in Norway. In fact, another man has been apprehended. Is the information posted on Breivik’s Facebook page an attempt to frame Christian Conservatives to later label them as potential terrorists? That is a very likely scenario, because that is what governments did with muslims after 9/11. See Anders Behring Breivik´s Facebook page here.

To all this we have to add that police delayed any action in the island of Utoya for 90 minutes. That allowed the shooter there to carry out its plan to shoot everyone who he found while the police arrived. During 9/11, fighting jets were also delayed by at least one hour which allowed the planes to make their way to New York City. The dying dinosaur main stream media blamed Muslims for Norway’s attack with zero evidence and also blamed “white” Al-Qaeda, again, with no proof of it.

Given the fact that Norway’s Prime Minister was supposed to meet and talk to the youngsters in Utoya, it makes it too convenient that the bomb in the government building was a well placed distraction to help the shooters in Utoya carry out the killings. Another convenient fact is that Anders Behring Breivik was supposedly a farmer. He was seen buying six tons of fertilizer before the massacre, his supplier said Saturday. The shooting started just hours after the explosion that destroyed the government building in Oslo where the prime minister’s office was located.

According to historian and researcher Webster G. Tarpley, the terror attack in Oslo has “telltale signs of a false flag provocation”.

“It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo. It has also come to light that a special police unit had been conducting a drill or exercise in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs – exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away little more than 48 hours later. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO. “

According to Norwegian media, several drills were conducted in the days before the attacks in Oslo, with men in black suits climbing down the walls of buildings downtown Oslo, just a few hundred meters from the prime minister’s office. This behaviour matches actions carried out in previous false-flag attacks such as the one on September 11, 2001. What government drills allow for is the collocation of explosives or car bombs -which may be part of the drill- and that in theory are fake explosives and fake car bombs, but that in reality are real explosives and real car bombs. Those who participate in the drills may or may not know about the real explosives or bombs, because the equipment and materials used during such drills are most often than not “real world” ones. The fact that drills occurred also protect those who may be to blame for the attack because “everything was part of the drill” and no one knew there were real explosives or real car bombs involved.

Another trait that makes the bomb blast in Oslo strange is that an acquaintance of Anders Behring Breivik, Ulav Andersson, says he may have been brainwashed. Anderson was also Breivik’s co-worker.

Breivik also attended Knight’s Templar meetings and as we reported before, he seems to also be a Freemason. The only thing that has not happened in Oslo’s terror attack is that Breivik has not been mysteriously murdered in prison or hung himself in his cell as it happened in other cases. But new developments will be unfolding in the following days and this outcome would not be a surprise.

While all this information is out there clearly pointing to false-flag attack, the main stream media and their security and terrorism experts choose to ignore them and go blame the Christian Conservative extremists.