May 18, 2010 3 Comments
By Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
May 18, 2010
Since I was a child I hear about the possibility of one world currency. Back then no one around me knew how to explain how thatwould come about or who would control it. The answer to those questions are now clear. Dominic Strauss-Kahn answered my childhood questions. A Global Currency managed by a Global Central Bank. The IMF chief said so in Zürich, Switzerland, during a meeting in which he confirmed his view that this crisis “is an opportunity”.
According to Kahn, the Global Central Bank and Currency would be a thing of last resort, in cases when the global economy is in shambles. He said the new currency would be a “risk-free asset for the system independent of national currencies,” and that a “global central bank could also serve as a lender of last resort”. How smart of Mr. Kahn. The problem is that this ideas aren’t new and aren’t his. The push for a global financial body has been in the works for decades.
The idea of a global body that controls the issuance of currency and all financial policy was created before the United Nations, the League of Nations and the European Union were born. This principle of concentrating power and policy originally intended to amass control with the excuse it would avoid economic corruption and disaster. However it doesn’t take too long to find out it is exactly the opposite. Just as the creation of the League of Nations, the United Nations and the European Union did not end war, neither will a centralized supranational organization end economic unrest. In fact, it will perpetuate it.
Let’s take a look at past events. Since the United Nations was born, we experienced conflicts in every continent. Those conflicts were not the works of countries against countries, but the destabilization came in the form of rogue groups sponsored by governments or their intelligence agencies. Mossad, MI6, CIA, Taliban and the IRA are just a few examples. Country-sponsored wars are a thing of the past, and in their letters of intent, the countries that pushed for the creation of the League of Nations and the U.N. knew they would not need such a tool because they also controlled terrorist organizations that would do the work for them.
In the world of economics and finances, the empires, or the countries that aspire to become empires also have their tools to carry out economic and financial terrorism. The Corporations that initially were outside governments hired financial institutions to carry out their fraudulent activities. Then, the Corporations became government and it got even easier to carry out financial terrorism. Multinational Banking Corporations established a new order controlled by themselves, ended oversight and created policies that effectively turned them into the masters of the world’s economy.
So, the bankers did not need Al-Qaeda, MI6, Mossad or the CIA to bring the world to its knees. That goal could be achieved from and through Wall Street, the IMF and Bank of International Settlements. The creation of regional blocks to promote commerce and exchange was an excuse to consolidate power and resources. This idea would later be tested at a global level by promoting the creation of a global financial entity which will control the issuance of money and the terms under which that money is lent.
What were the results of the concentration of financial and economic policy in Europe? We are seeing them right now. Iceland, Greece and now Spain, Portugal and England are in shambles. Why? Because financial homogenization is not meant to provide stable economies and sound policies, but to tighten controls and carry out policies that will allow the bankers even more. The goal of the bankers has never been to have a stable economy with sound monetary policy, because in that kind of world they have less control and the wealth is not concentrated in their hands.
Let’s look at another example history provides us: The creation and adoption of globalist policies like the free trade agreements. NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT to mention a few, were the troops on the ground for the bankers. The end of the industrial world, the end of Capitalism -as it successfully worked for some time-, gave way to open borders for cheap, toxic products to flow and illegal aliens to migrate. Not only did the free-trade agreements ended industry, but also annihilated the social safety net in the nations of the western world. While cities’ and towns’ monies were robbed and divested to imaginary financial products, illegal aliens sucked dry the already battered social services in every nation of the Americas and Europe.
Nowadays, the most influential politicians and pop culture stars plead for the nations to disrespect their constitutions and laws by allowing not only free-trade agreements, but the continuous flow of illegals through every possible place at the borders. Enforcing immigration and constitutional laws is seen as racist and those proposing legal immigration are labeled as unjust, inhumane and simply lunatics. This is exactly the result the banking globalists hoped for. Dividing and conquering has never looked better. Sound immigration policies are sure radical in a world where everyone unconsciously believes open borders are the normal thing and cheap slave-made goods are the best bang for their buck.
Now that we have taken a look back, let’s take a look forward. What would a world with more concentrated power and control in the hands of the makers of the current crisis look like? Let’s be optimistic and say it could not look better, it will not look better. The centralization of power and governance at regional levels is what caused the mess we are in right now, so further centralization in the hands of those who financed Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Noriega, Pinochet, Saddam and who now control and finance the shadow governments of the United States, Great Britain, Asia and Africa, will spin the world even more out of control. For their benefit, of course. History doesn’t lie, does it?
Those who promised the end of wars, only brought more of it, and those who promised financial stability only created more inequality, poverty and misery. Would you trust your house keys to the thief who stands outside your property to take care of it? You wouldn’t. You shouldn’t. In the next election, wherever you live, vote yourself in and vote the crooks out. That is the only way to defeat their agenda of conquest and slavery. Many people are already actively working to end the global tyranny they created decades ago, so you are not alone.
Now, enough talk! Let’s act! Next, there is a list of some of the corporations in fraudulently in charge of the world today. I am hoping you can deny them the privilege of running your life. Stop using, buying or in any way consuming their products. Let’s use their globalism against them. A global boycott of their cheap, toxic and fraudulent products will be the first step.
Disney Adidas Time Warner IBM
Merck Napa Holiday Inn ACE
Old Navy Ford Seven Eleven USPS
Comcast Chevrolet Citgo VISA
CNN Dyncorp Pepsi Chevron
Coca Cola True Value Kraft Chrysler
Exxon Mobile General Electric Starbucks Westinghouse
Taco Bell Wells Fargo America Online KFC
NBC Universal American Airlines Royal Dutch Shell Bank of America
CBS The Carlyle Group GAP Master Card
Master Card Stop&Shop HBO ABC
Nike Wal Mart Jiffy Lube JP Morgan
GM Volkswagen Fox News Channel Monsanto
Du Pont NASA Pizza Hut Syngenta
Microsoft Mc Donald’s Home Depot Safe Way
Burger King Sony Dodge Intel
Staples Verizon Toro John Deere
Firestone Bechtel MSNBC Goodyear
Amoco AT&T Mitsubishi Nestle
Feel free to suggest names of more corporations through the comment section. Also, respond to our poll regarding corporate control of government below.