DNA «

Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality

November 1, 2011 1 Comment

IRT
November 1, 2011

“This study was just routine,” said Russian biologist Alexey V. Surov, in what could end up as the understatement of this century. Surov and his colleagues set out to discover if Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) soy, grown on 91% of US soybean fields, leads to problems in growth or reproduction. What he discovered may uproot a multi-billion dollar industry.

After feeding hamsters for two years over three generations, those on the GM diet, and especially the group on the maximum GM soy diet, showed devastating results. By the third generation, most GM soy-fed hamsters lost the ability to have babies. They also suffered slower growth, and a high mortality rate among the pups.

And if this isn’t shocking enough, some in the third generation even had hair growing inside their mouths—a phenomenon rarely seen, but apparently more prevalent among hamsters eating GM soy.

The study, jointly conducted by Surov’s Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the National Association for Gene Security, was published in July 2010.

He used Campbell hamsters, with a fast reproduction rate, divided into 4 groups. All were fed a normal diet, but one was without any soy, another had non-GM soy, a third used GM soy, and a fourth contained higher amounts of GM soy. They used 5 pairs of hamsters per group, each of which produced 7-8 litters, totally 140 animals.

Surov told The Voice of Russia,

“Originally, everything went smoothly. However, we noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from their cubs and continued to feed them as before. These pairs’ growth rate was slower and reached their sexual maturity slowly.”

He selected new pairs from each group, which generated another 39 litters. There were 52 pups born to the control group and 78 to the non-GM soy group. In the GM soy group, however, only 40 pups were born. And of these, 25% died. This was a fivefold higher death rate than the 5% seen among the controls. Of the hamsters that ate high GM soy content, only a single female hamster gave birth. She had 16 pups; about 20% died.

Surov said “The low numbers in F2 [third generation] showed that many animals were sterile.”

The published paper will also include measurements of organ size for the third generation animals, including testes, spleen, uterus, etc. And if the team can raise sufficient funds, they will also analyze hormone levels in collected blood samples.

Hair Growing in the Mouth

Earlier this year, Surov co-authored a paper in Doklady Biological Sciences showing that in rare instances, hair grows inside recessed pouches in the mouths of hamsters.

“Some of these pouches contained single hairs; others, thick bundles of colorless or pigmented hairs reaching as high as the chewing surface of the teeth. Sometimes, the tooth row was surrounded with a regular brush of hair bundles on both sides. The hairs grew vertically and had sharp ends, often covered with lumps of a mucous.” Rat Study Oral Hair

“(a) The external appearance of the oral cavity. Gingival pouches (GP) with thick bundles of hair growing from their mucous lining are clearly seen. (b) Perforated bone tissue of the teeth of an adult Ph. campbelli. Numerous hollows are seen. A, hair.”

From A. S. Baranov, O. F. Chernova, N. Yu. Feoktistova, and A. V. Surov, “A New Example of Ectopia: Oral Hair in Some Rodent Species,” Doklady Biological Sciences, 2010, Vol. 431, pp. 117–120, Original Russian Text © A.S. Baranov, O.F. Chernova, N.Yu. Feoktistova, A.V. Surov, 2010, published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2010, Vol. 431, No. 4, pp. 559–562.

At the conclusion of the study, the authors surmise that such an astounding defect may be due to the diet of hamsters raised in the laboratory. They write, “This pathology may be exacerbated by elements of the food that are absent in natural food, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (GM soybean or maize meal) or contaminants (pesticides, mycotoxins, heavy metals, etc.).” Indeed, the number of hairy mouthed hamsters was much higher among the third generation of GM soy fed animals than anywhere Surov had seen before.

Preliminary, But Ominous

Surov warns against jumping to early conclusions. He said, “It is quite possible that the GMO does not cause these effects by itself.” Surov wants to make the analysis of the feed components a priority, to discover just what is causing the effect and how.

In addition to the GMOs, it could be contaminants, he said, or higher herbicide residues, such as Roundup. There is in fact much higher levels of Roundup on these beans; they’re called “Roundup Ready.” Bacterial genes are forced into their DNA so that the plants can tolerate Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide. Therefore, GM soy always carries the double threat of higher herbicide content, couple with any side effects of genetic engineering.

Years of Reproductive Disorders from GMO-Feed

Rats photo #1 Surov’s hamsters are just the latest animals to suffer from reproductive disorders after consuming GMOs. In 2005, Irina Ermakova, also with the Russian National Academy of Sciences, reported that more than half the babies from mother rats fed GM soy died within three weeks. This was also five times higher than the 10% death rate of the non-GMO soy group. The babies in the GM group were also smaller (see photo) and could not reproduce.

In a telling coincidence, after Ermakova’s feeding trials, her laboratory started feeding all the rats in the facility a commercial rat chow using GM soy. Within two months, the infant mortality facility-wide reached 55%.

When Ermakova fed male rats GM soy, their testicles changed from the normal pink to dark blue!

Italian scientists similarly found changes in mice testes (PDF), including damaged young sperm cells. Furthermore, the DNA of embryos from parent mice fed GM soy functioned differently.

An Austrian government study published in November 2008 showed that the more GM corn was fed to mice, the fewer the babies they had (PDF), and the smaller the babies were.

Central Iowa Farmer Jerry Rosman also had trouble with pigs and cows becoming sterile. Some of his pigs even had false pregnancies or gave birth to bags of water. After months of investigations and testing, he finally traced the problem to GM corn feed. Every time a newspaper, magazine, or TV show reported Jerry’s problems, he would receive calls from more farmers complaining of livestock sterility on their farm, linked to GM corn.

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine accidentally discovered that rats raised on corncob bedding “neither breed nor exhibit reproductive behavior.” Tests on the corn material revealed two compounds that stopped the sexual cycle in females “at concentrations approximately two-hundredfold lower than classical phytoestrogens.” One compound also curtailed male sexual behavior and both substances contributed to the growth of breast and prostate cancer cell cultures. Researchers found that the amount of the substances varied with GM corn varieties. The crushed corncob used at Baylor was likely shipped from central Iowa, near the farm of Jerry Rosman and others complaining of sterile livestock.

In Haryana, India, a team of investigating veterinarians report that buffalo consuming GM cottonseed suffer from infertility, as well as frequent abortions, premature deliveries, and prolapsed uteruses. Many adult and young buffalo have also died mysteriously.

Denial, Attack and Canceled Follow-up

Scientists who discover adverse findings from GMOs are regularly attacked, ridiculed, denied funding, and even fired. When Ermakova reported the high infant mortality among GM soy fed offspring, for example, she appealed to the scientific community to repeat and verify her preliminary results. She also sought additional funds to analyze preserved organs. Instead, she was attacked and vilified. Samples were stolen from her lab, papers were burnt on her desk, and she said that her boss, under pressure from his boss, told her to stop doing any more GMO research. No one has yet repeated Ermakova’s simple, inexpensive studies.

In an attempt to offer her sympathy, one of her colleagues suggested that maybe the GM soy will solve the over population problem!

Surov reports that so far, he has not been under any pressure.

Opting Out of the Massive GMO Feeding Experiment

Without detailed tests, no one can pinpoint exactly what is causing the reproductive travesties in Russian hamsters and rats, Italian and Austrian mice, and livestock in India and America. And we can only speculate about the relationship between the introduction of genetically modified foods in 1996, and the corresponding upsurge in low birth weight babies, infertility, and other problems among the US population. But many scientists, physicians, and concerned citizens don’t think that the public should remain the lab animals for the biotech industry’s massive uncontrolled experiment.

Alexey Surov says, “We have no right to use GMOs until we understand the possible adverse effects, not only to ourselves but to future generations as well. We definitely need fully detailed studies to clarify this. Any type of contamination has to be tested before we consume it, and GMO is just one of them.”

Filed under World Tagged with DNA, gingival pouches, GM soy, GMO, GMO soy, hair growing in mouth, heavy metals, herbicide conntent, high mortality, infant mortality, infertility, mycotoxins, National Association for Gene Security, oral cavity, perforated tissue, pesticides, phytoestrogens, reproduction rate, reproductive disorders, Roundup, RoundUp Ready, Russian Academy of Sciences, slower growth, sterile

China Uses Dead Babies to Make Stamina Booster Pills

August 9, 2011

IBT.com
August 9, 2011

A South Korean SBS TV documentary team accuses Chinese pharmaceutical companies of selling dead baby pills as stamina boosters.

The team reveals that the truth behind the dead baby pill is horrific and disturbing.

Chinese hospitals and abortion clinics that are connected to the business immediately notify pharmaceutical companies when a baby dies, mostly because of a still birth or an abortion.

The companies purchase the baby corpses and store them in some family’s refrigerator to avoid suspicion. The next step in this highly secretive process is putting the corpses in a medical drying microwave and grinding them into pills. The ground baby powder is then put in a capsule, ready to be sold as a stamina enhancer, according to the SBS team.

The Korean team acquired the dead baby capsules and ran DNA tests on it. The test results reportedly indicated the pills were 99.7 percent human. The test also found hair and nail remnants, and even the gender of the baby could be identified. The process was aired with visuals in the SBS TV documentary on Aug. 6, 2011 in South Korea.

SBS further reveals that there has been a business network established between China and South Korea for a while, to fulfill the baby capsule demand in South Korean market.

Besides the dead baby pills, microwave dried placenta is another popular business in China, which hospital staff are allegedly openly involved with.

Filed under World Tagged with baby pills, china uses dead babies as stamina boosters, chinese pharmaceutical companies, company buys baby corpses, dead babies put in refrigeration, dead babies used for pills, dead baby capsules, DNA, grinding babies, medical drying, microwave dried placenta, SBS TV, stamina boosters, stamina enhancer

Genocídio Genético: Engenharia Genética Ameaça… a Vida

July 29, 2011

A engenharia genética não é nova. Aparentemente, ela tem sido discutida, se não aplicada, desde 1960. O problema com a modificação genética de plantas, animais, plantas e animais, clonagem e fusão de genes não é sua existência. É o resultado dessas práticas não regulamentadas que deve alarmar-nos.

Por Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
29 de julho de 2011

Se você for parcial ou totalmente ignorante sobre os produtos transgénicos, não o culpo. Em 15 anos de pesquisa não consegui obter uma compreensão significativa do que a engenharia genética de seres humanos, peixes, soja, milho, leite e outros produtos pode significar para a humanidade.

Quando comecei a escrever, o meu primeiro desafio foi como apresentar a informação de forma concisa, mas atraente o suficiente para acordar as pessoas que ainda acreditam que a clonagem de humanos e animais para a remoção de órgãos, fundindo genes humanos e animais e fabricando alimentos a partir de DNA ou tecidos humanos é ficção científica.

Pensei então, que o mais atraente para começar era simplesmente fornecer algumas manchetes de alguns dos itens e documentos que encontrei durante meu processo de pesquisa, para que os leitores tenham uma idéia imediata do que a engenharia genética realmente significa e como isso afeta diretamente agora e como lhes afetara no futuro. A publicação dos titulares também vai facilitar a pesquisa para você e lhe dar a oportunidade de fazer suas próprias pesquisas.

Então vamos ver o que nos é dito pelos proprietários.

Por que o futuro não precisa de nós?

Novas diretrizes federais permitem a criação de quimeras homem-animal

Perigos dos alimentos geneticamente modificados incluem baixa fertilidade, lesões de órgãos e distúrbios hormonais.

Cabras transgênicas mostram o rumo para o futuro

Fusão de Genes de cabras e aranhas produzem “tecido” estranho

Peixes transgénicos podem ameaçar populações selvagens

“Gene de Tróia” poderia acabar com os peixes

Quimeras, Híbridos e clonagem humano-animal

Produção de frangos transgênicos usando células mediadas da medula óssea

Parte Monstros Humanos / Parte híbridos: Animais estão sendo criados por cientistas ao redor do globo
Clone Coelho-humano anunciado sem narizes frias

O caso de uso de Contracepção Imunológica para o controle de natalidade

Endosulfan e Alterações Endócrinas: Caracterização do Risco Humano

19 Estudos Apontam Alimentos GM como Responsáveis de Disfunção de Orgãos

Pesticidas criados geneticamente ligados a defeitos de nascimento, deficiência de hormônios masculinos, e Câncer

Além de ser comparado a “brincar de Deus” engenharia genética, literalmente enfraquece os blocos de construção da vida, e como prática funciona sem qualquer regulamentação. Além disso, há iniciativas para promover a desregulamentação e a criação de legislação para dispensar a supervisão de engenharia genética inteira. A minha pergunta sobre a desregulamentação da engenharia genética foi então: E se os cientistas que têm quantias ilimitadas de dinheiro e recursos não têm nenhuma responsabilidade legal por suas experiências em clonagem humana ou a criação e manipulação novas espécies?

A última vez que um grupo de cientistas recebeu fundos e recursos ilimitados, eles conseguiram criar coisas como a bomba atômica, bomba de hidrogênio, e agora estão tentando imitar a origem do universo com o infame SuperCollider. Todos nós sabemos o que aconteceu quando empresas e governos sem a devida supervisão usaram as duas primeiras tecnologias.

Quando você pensa sobre os organismos geneticamente modificados, é sempre tentador acreditar que esses organismos são criados e são objecto de experiências só nos países industrializados em laboratórios de alta tecnologia que estão disponíveis. Talvez você pense que somente são realizados em laboratórios de pesquisa de propriedade de empresas farmacêuticas ou de universidades públicas e privadas. O que você pensaria se eu lhe dissesse que a clonagem de seres humanos e animais, por exemplo, acontece em Costa Rica, e que esta prática foi levada a cabo pelo menos uma década? Foi relatado no Washington Post, e o artigo descreve a discussão sobre a clonagem humana entre os cientistas:

“Durante uma reunião recente, os cientistas discordaram sobre questões básicas como saber se seria antiético de um embrião humano para começar o seu desenvolvimento no útero de um animal, e se um rato seria melhor ou pior, com um cérebro feito de neurônios humanos .. “

Assim, centenas de empresas e governos são livres para conduzir experimentos genéticos em milhares de laboratórios misturando espécies diferentes, e são completamente livres para colocá-los no fornecimento de comida e água no planeta, sem supervisão. Essa é a conclusão da situação que enfrentamos agora.

Evidência de Engenharia Genética, Clonagem e Fusão Gênica

Se você não pode ou não quer entrar na pesquisa pesada, eu estou prestes a dar um relatório detalhado sobre o estado da engenharia genética, clonagem de seres humanos e animais e a fusão de genes.

Vamos começar com, possivelmente, o mais preocupante, mas não o fato mais recente. Alguns cientistas estão fundindo genes de humanos e animais para promover o crescimento de clones humanos no estômago das vacas. Seres humanos clonados e animais são submetidos a esses processos de modo que eles são “fábricas farmacêuticas vivas através da produção de substâncias farmacêuticas valiosas em seu leite, ou como fábricas de órgãos porque os seus órgãos ou sangue não será rejeitada pelo sistema imunológico humano“.

A razão para a clonagem de seres humanos e animais e a fusão genética dos genes é freqüentemente apontada como uma solução para muitos problemas pela sua alegado “conveniência”. Claro, existe a necessidade de encontrar uma cura para todas as doenças e ter órgãos disponíveis quando as pessoas destroem seus próprios órgãos depois de fumar por 40 anos ou beber seus fundos de pensão até o fim. Não seria conveniente ter um banco de órgãos, ou uma cura para o câncer de pulmão e estômago? Quem poderia opor-se à produção de fetos humanos no útero de animais, ou a remoção de órgãos de animais ou outros seres humanos para substituir os nossos? Conveniente, não? Não.

Em uma fazenda perto de Reno Nevada, um fazendeiro cria ovelhas que têm fígados, corações e cérebros humanos nelas, entre outros. O “cientista” que está a cargo do experimento disse que não podia esperar para ver o efeito que teriam as células humanas no cérebro do animal. Ele tinha injetado os genes nas ovelhas. De acordo com o relatório da Associated Press, essas experiências são abrangidas as novas diretrizes éticas que regem o tipo de “pesquisa científica” feito na fazenda.

Em um artigo de 19 de junho de 2011, The Telegraph de Londres anuncia que os porcos são agora capazes de hospedar órgãos de outras espécies pois os cientistas descobriram que podem criar animais quiméricos com órgãos que pertencem a uma outra espécie ao injetar células-tronco no embrião de outra espécie. Outro artigo no Daily Mail anuncia como porcos servem como fazendas de órgãos humanos. “Órgãos humanos podem ser cultivados em suínos para uso em operações de transplante após uma pesquisa pioneira.” Então foi lançada uma campanha publicitária baseada em conveniência, dizendo que “o método poderia ajudar a reduzir o risco do órgão transplantado fosse rejeitado. “Tais experiências também permitem que o sangue animal para transfusão seja usado sempre que um paciente necessita. Portanto, o clone será colhida por seus órgãos e as pessoas vão ter peças geneticamente modificadas disponíveis quando necessário.

A publicação The New Atlantic até se atreveu a perguntar por que não seria uma boa idéia usar úteros artificiais. O artigo afirma que células humanas e / ou animais ou seus próprios genes para esses fins é um relativamente novo e imperfeito. É provável que o autor ignore esse tipo de manipulação genética tem sido discutido, se não aplicado, a partir de meados da década de 1960. Então não há nada de novo aqui.

O Plano atrás da Engenharia Genética Humana e de Alimentos

Um aspecto muitas vezes esquecido no debate sobre a clonagem humana e a engenharia genética, é o objetivo, ou objetivos reais que esta prática tem. Porque acredite em mim, não importa quão conveniente possa parecer, ela não é para ajudar os seres humanos a viver uma vida longa e saudável. Empresas e universidades financiadas com dinheiro dos contribuintes estão investigando como criar e melhorar técnicas que beneficiem a vida humana, porque aqueles que irão implementar essas tecnologias têm a intenção de governar um mundo sem seres humanos. Será que isto parece uma loucura? O artigo no The New Atlantic tenta ser positivo sobre essas experiências e relacioná-los para uma melhor, mais saudável humanidade. “Hoje, temos avançado um pouco, mas apenas ligeiramente, em direção ao aperfeiçoamento da tecnologia, que permitiria atingir a visão de Haldane, embora por razões diferentes da melhora da raça.” O problema é que é exatamente alí onde se originaram experiências genéticas humanas e é por isso que ainda estão acontecendo. Se o futuro não precisa de seres humanos para inventar, projetar, construir, reparar ou reproduzir-se, para que o mundo precisa dos seres humanos? Imitando os poderes reprodutivos humanos, como o autor de The New Atlantic diz, é chamado “ectogênese” e tem sido tentado por séculos.

“Em vez de gastar todo o talento científico e recursos no desenvolvimento de úteros artificiais”, escreveu o correspondente da ciência para a Reason, Ronald Bailey, “Eu suspeito que será muito mais fácil e mais barato criar embriões humanos em gestações com outros mamíferos, como vacas e cavalos, do que fazer o mesmo com úteros artificiais.”

Embora a tecnologia moderna permite todos os tipos de experimentos na medicina, alimentos, água e ar, a meta geral não é e ajudar a humanidade a expandir sua presença neste planeta. A maioria dos artigos que encontrei na minha pesquisa tem todos os tipos de cenários em que a engenharia genética é aplicada a nosso favor. De cabras aranha a leite humana produzida por vacas, salmão, soja e milho GM, as aplicações são infinitas. Uma das respostas mais comuns quando as pessoas pró transgênicos sao questionadas sobre os perigos de brincar com a vida é que esta tecnologia pode ajudar a alimentar os famintos e melhorar a vida dos pobres.

Mas, na prática, todos e cada um destes métodos geralmente rotulados extensores de vida, como vemos agora com os eletrônicos, apenas causam a degeneração da espécie humana. Por conveniência, promessas vazias e do que poderia acontecer, aqueles que são autorizados por sua riqueza e poder político querem usar nosso próprio DNA para acabar com a vida humana como a conhecemos.

Em um artigo intitulado Por que o Futuro Não Precisa de Nós? a Revista Wired explora a possibilidade de que os seres humanos se tornem uma espécie em extinção porque as tecnologias tornam as pessoas em consumidores inúteis, como alguns globalistas têm chamado a humanidade. Os seres humanos “escolhidos” para realmente tirar partido da mais recente tecnologia iram se fundir com robôs ou serão robôs, no que será o próximo nível de criaturas conscientes. Como Ray Kurzweil, inventor da primeira máquina de leitura para cegos escreve em seu livro The Age of Spiritual Machines, os seres humanos estão mais próximos da imortalidade com o uso de tecnologia robótica. Mas o que acontecerá com o resto de nós, nossos filhos e netos que virão depois de nós?

Qual é a Ameaça da Engenharia Genética?

Em suma, a loucura fora do controle da ciência moderna e da biotecnologia significa o genocídio genético. Dependendo de onde você obtem informação, cientistas e pesquisadores concordam em que o denominador comum das formas de engenharia genética é o fim das formas de vida atuais. Segundo o pesquisador Jeffrey Smith, quando animais de laboratório foram alimentados com organismos geneticamente modificados, o resultado foi esterilização completa. A esterilização que em alguns casos aconteceu na segunda e terceira geração, tambem aconteceu ao longo das vidas dos sujeitos estudados.

William Muir e Richard Howard, da Universidade Purdue, Indiana, alertaram sobre um “gene de Tróia” nos peixes transgénicos, que poderiam destruir as formas naturais destes peixes em todo o mundo se os peixes geneticamente modificados são soltos na natureza ou fogem das fazendas. “Isso se parece com o cavalo de Tróia”, disse Muir. “Ele vem como uma coisa boa e acaba por destruir a população.” Ambos Muir e Howard estudaram o uso de hormônios de crescimento humano em peixes, que agora é usado em experimentos de laboratório com salmão para crescer mais rápido, enquanto come menos alimentos. Os pesquisadores descobriram que os peixes geneticamente modificados desenvolveram a maturidade sexual mais rápido do que o resto e produziu mais ovos. De acordo com uma reportagem da BBC, Professor Muir diz que peixes transgénicos “iriam desfrutar dos mesmos benefícios em uma reprodução natural, de modo que o gene hGH se espalharia rapidamente através de uma população de peixes.”

O hormônio de crescimento humano (hGH) é também colocado no alimento dado para o gado e outros animais que os humanos consomem mais tarde. Coincidentemente, os seres humanos masculinos e femininos têm experimentado um desenvolvimento físico prematuro, com as meninas atingindo a puberdade em idades mais jovens, enquanto as crianças masculinas sofreram alterações hormonais que muitos pesquisadores associam à feminização da maior parte dos machos humanos.

Outros estudos mostram que o consumo de organismos geneticamente modificados resulta em problemas como baixa fertilidade, lesões de órgãos e distúrbios hormonais. Este último é especialmente importante porque é através das mudanças hormonais que alguns cientistas descobriram como e por que alguns homens estão começando a perder o interesse no acasalamento e algumas mulheres escolhem parceiras do mesmo sexo ao invés de homens. No estudo intitulado: “A comparação dos efeitos de três variedades de milho GM na saúde de mamíferos,” o International Journal of Biological Sciences concluiu que o milho Bt da Monsanto contribui para a insuficiência hepática. Todos os tipos de milho desenvolvidos pela Monsanto (MON 863, MON 810 e NK 603) tem sido aprovados pela FDA e rotulados como seguros para consumo humano nos Estados Unidos e Europa.

Outros estudos avaliando o uso de pesticidas revelaram que essas substâncias químicas causaram desregulação endócrina. Ingredientes como o glifosato utilizado em Roundup, causam defeitos congênitos em animais. Defeitos de nascimento são chamados ciclopia, ou o aparecimento de um único olho no meio da testa. Além disso, o glifosato provoca natimortos e abortos.

Um estudo realizado na Argentina, confirmou o que estudos anteriores já haviam mostrado sobre as conseqüências da ingestão de produtos contaminados com pesticidas e herbicidas. Andres Carrasco, diretor do Laboratório de Embriologia molecular na Universidade de Buenos Aires, apresentou um relatório que explica como o Roundup da Monsanto é o responsável por causar a infertilidade, a destruição dos espermatozóides e câncer. Carrasco testou os efeitos do glifosato em embriões animais e constatou que o produto químico altera e compromete o desenvolvimento embrionário. “Eu não descobri nada de novo”, disse Carrasco, “Eu só confirmei o que outros cientistas descobriram … A evidência científica e, sobretudo, centenas de pessoas afetadas são a prova viva desta emergência de saúde pública.”

Recentemente, o Daily Mail do Reino Unido informou sobre como os cientistas da Inglaterra estão fazendo experiências com clones que são metade homem e metade animal e como estes experimentos foram mantidos em segredo. “A revelação vem apenas um dia depois que um comitê de cientistas alertou para um cenário semelhante ao “Planeta dos Macacos”, um pesadelo em que o trabalho com clones de humanos e animais vai longe demais”, diz o artigo.

Mas a bolacha mais difícil de mastigar não é nenhum desses exemplos de manipulação humana, animal ou planta que mostrei. Como mencionado anteriormente, nada de bom vem quando as corporações, governos e cientistas que estão sob seu controle e / ou que são pagos por estas duas entidades são livres para fazer o que querem. A questão então migra para armas biológicas. Durante o último século, pelo menos, os governos em parceria com a indústria da biotecnologia começaram um movimento para produzir armas biológicas que foram projetadas especificamente para certas raças. Essas armas seriam utilizadas como armas biológicas para matar populações inimigas. Mas, quais são as chances de que armas biológicas sejam utilizadas em todos nós? Quase as mesmas chances de que os organismos geneticamente modificados cheguem ao abastecimento de alimentos e água. Em outras palavras, é muito provável. Como o link acima exemplifica, ex-secretário de Defesa dos Estados Unidos, William Cohen, descreveu o que ele pensava que era a ameaça representada por alguns países que tentavam desenvolver “certos tipos de patógenos”, que foram criados especificamente para certos grupos étnicos.

O infame documento intitulado Reconstruindo as Defesas da América: Estratégia, Forças e Recursos descreve como o estabelecimento pode tentar desenvolver “formas avançadas de agentes biológicos que possam direcionar-se a genótipos específicos … transformando a guerra biológica em uma ferramenta útil politicamente.” Não há uma doença humana ou animal que você conheça, que o Estabelecimento não tenha pensado usar como arma biológica. Febre hemorrágica e Ebola são duas das mais conhecidas armas biológicas, que naturalmente foram testadas primeiro em animais.

Além de armas biológicas, a mais mundana engenharia genética que é apresentada como um avanço que beneficia a humanidade, de repente se volta contra seus criadores. Essas pequenas modificações feitas aos genes humanos, animais e plantas estão escoando fora do controle humano e misturando com outras espécies. Conforme relatado no GM.org, cientistas da Universidade de Bristol anunciaram a descoberta de uma rota, na qual os genes geneticamente modificados “saltam” para outras espécies e invadem o ambiente. Esta invasão, dizem os cientistas, poderia vir na forma de infecção ou de proliferação, não importa quais as barreiras existentes entre as espécies.

Então, não interessa se é de mutação natural ou infecção derivada de experiências realizadas por cientistas que “brincar de Deus”, os seres humanos estão ameaçados pelas criações genéticas e armas biológicas que podem ser direcionadas para raças ou etnias especificas. Escolha o seu veneno. De qualquer forma, estas duas formas são e serão geneticamente modificadas.

Genes em alimentos geneticamente modificados e outros produtos químicos são a fonte da maioria das alergias. Enquanto isso, os governos lutam ao lado das empresas farmacêuticas e químicas para proibir qualquer tipo de rotulagem dos ingredientes transgênicos nos alimentos. A maioria das pessoas nem sequer sabem que a carne que comem vem de um touro clonado ou duas ou mais espécies, ou que o leite que bebem é de uma vaca clonada. Como poderiam saber? Não há nenhum rótulo!

O número de pessoas infectadas com doenças raras, como câncer, diabetes, autismo, alergias e outros problemas de saúde estão subindo rapidamente, e isso não tem uma outra origem do que o jogo de roleta russa conduzida por cientistas loucos que são suportados por uma classe dominante fora de controle. As mesmas pessoas que experimentaram em crianças dando-lhes poliomielite e sífilis, o mesmo Estabelecimento que fabrica Ebola que se espalha pelo ar e financia abortos na China, os que disseram que planejamento familiar é a melhor ferramenta para a independência das mulheres são as mesmas pessoas que, em sua busca louca pela imortalidade estão colocando em risco nossa própria existência.

Isso é o que sabemos sobre a ameaça que a engenharia genética representa para os seres humanos. Pelo menos é o que eu sei. Você pode imaginar o que não sabemos?

Materiais consultados:

Life Magazine. Control of Life. 1965.

Wired Magazine. Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us. April 2000.

Organic Consumers Association. New Federal Guidelines Will Allow Creation of Human-Animals Chimeras. April 27, 2005.

Natural Living 360. GM Food Dangers Include: Low Fertility, Organ Damage and Hormone Disruption. May 30, 2011.

GMO.org. Scientists Discover New Route For GM Genes To Jump Species. March 4, 2011.

BBC. GM goat spins web based future. August 21, 2000.

The Telegraph. ‘Spider-goats’ start work on wonder web. Jan 18, 2002.

Purdue University News. Transgenic fish could threaten wild populations. April 2000.

BBC. ‘Trojan gene’ could wipe out fish. December 1, 1999.

Infowars. Chimeras, Cloning and Freak Human-Animal Hybrids. November 23, 2004.

Laboratory Investigation. Bone marrow cell-mediated production of transgenic chickens. April 25, 2011.

The American Dream. Part Human/Part Animal Hybrid Monsters Are Being Created By Scientists All Over The Planet.

Natural News. Phthalate warning: Medications contain chemicals that “feminize” unborn baby boys. November 17, 2009.

ABI. Human-rabbit clone announced and no noses twitch. August 26, 2003.

Lisa K. Chambers, Malcolm A. Lawson and Lyn A. Hinds. The Case for Fertility Control Using Immunocontraception.

Laura M. Plunkett, Ph.D., DABT Integrative Biostrategies, LLC. Endosulfan and Endocrine Disruption: Human Risk Characterization. June 23, 2008.

Dr.Mercola. 19 Studies Link GMO Foods to Organ Disruption. April 27, 2011

Dr. Leonard Coldwell. GMO Pesticides linked to birth defects, disruption of male hormones, cancer. April 28, 2011.

NPR. Cloned Beef: It’s What’s for Dinner? January 16, 2008.

Consumer Affair. Genetically Engineered Foods May Cause Rising Food Allergies. June 8, 2007

Filed under World Tagged with a alteração de hormônios masculinos, a ameaça dos OGM, a ética da clonagem, a clonagem humana, a clonagem humana Costa Rica, a desregulamentação dos OGM, a febre hemorrágica, a população de salmão selvagem, a soja transgênica, alergias, armas biológicas, étnica específica de armas biológicas, úteros artificiais, baixa fertilidade, cabras aranha, carne de animais clonados, clonagem, clonagem em Costa Rica, clones do crescimento humano, combinação de genes, controle da fertilidade, corações artificiais, corporações, corrida armamentista, de novas espécies, defeitos de nascimento, distúrbios hormonais, DNA, Ebola armas, ectogênese, Endosulfan, engenharia genética, fábricas gene Trojan órgão, fígado artificial, fetos humanos no útero de animais, galinhas transgênicas, genótipos específicos, genes OGM salto entre espécies, genes splicing humanos, genocídio genética faz alergias OGM, glifosato O milho GM, GM salmão, guerra biológica, híbridos humano-animal, hGH, homem-coelho clone de engenharia, humano-animal quimeras, imunocontracepção, ingredientes transgênicos, leite clonados, lesões de órgãos, má ciência, medula óssea, o cérebro artificial, o leite materno na pronuncia vaca, o sangue clonado, o sistema imunológico humano, OGM ligada à ruptura de órgãos, organismos geneticamente modificados, organismos geneticamente modificados associados ao câncer, os blocos de construção da vida, os genes de animais splicing, os governos, os perigos dos herbicidas, os riscos alimentares transgénicos, os seres humanos geneticamente modificados, peixes transgênicos, perigos de agrotóxicos coloca em risco a vida, pesticidas GM, puberdade precoce, Supercollider, transgênicos leite

Pentagon to Use Genetic Code to Identify Perfect Soldier?

July 29, 2011

by Joe Wolverton, II
The New American
January 24, 2011

Old soldiers never die, they just pass on their genetic code?

A report issued by a defense science advisory panel suggests that the Pentagon may begin collecting DNA from military personnel to identify the genome sequence that defines a good soldier. Findings reported by JASON, an independent group of scientists which advises the U.S. government on matters of science and technology, recommends that the Pentagon take advantage of “the rapidly falling cost of gene sequencing by preparing to engage in the mass sequencing of the genomes” of the men and women of the armed forces.

From the movie Captain America

The physicists, biologists, chemists, oceanographers, mathematicians, and computer scientists that comprise the JASON project, point out that the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have access to an untapped source of valuable genetic information and are “uniquely positioned to make great advances” in the science of genetic research in this crucial field. Specifically mentioned are the decades of archived medical records and DNA samples already on file at the VA.

A commentary on the report published by the ACLU claims:

Specifically, the report recommends that the Pentagon begin collecting [and] sequencing soldiers’ DNA for “diagnostic and predictive applications.” It recommends that the military begin seeking correlations between soldiers’ genotypes and phenotypes (outward characteristics) “of relevance to the military” in order to correlate the two. And the report says — without offering details — that both “offensive and defensive military operations” could be affected.

The privacy concerns of such a program are obvious. The threshold question that the Pentagon would have to answer would be whether the collection of such samples (whether archival, contemporary, or future) presents a thorny legal problem in that the blood or other substances derived from the body of subjects is the property of that subject and therefore protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law.

Congress has legislated in this general area. In 2008, Congress passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), which prohibits group health plans and health insurers from denying coverage to a healthy individual or charging that person higher premiums based solely on a person’s genetic predisposition to the possible of development of disease. The law also bars employers from using individuals’ genetic information when making personnel decisions.

While GINA does not apply to the military, it is certainly an indication of the opposition any similar use of genome sequences would face in Congress were the Defense Department to attempt such a project.

Regardless of whether the DoD makes such use of the DNA of soldiers, airmen, and marines, there is no doubt as to the surprising amount of such data already under the control of the Pentagon.

As reported in an article published in the American Journal of Human Genetics:

Currently, DoD collects and uses the genetic information of service members in several ways. All U.S. service members, including active duty and reserve military personnel, must provide a DNA sample that may be used to identify their remains should they die in battle (see Armed Forces Institute of Pathology database online). These samples are housed in the Armed Forces Repository of Specimen Samples for the Identification of Remains. As of 2002, the United States military’s DNA repository contained 3.2 million samples.

Inarguably, the accurate identification of battlefield casualties is an appropriate use of DNA material; however, the use of that very personal data as a sample for compiling the specific genetic code of the perfect soldier is much more controversial for a few reasons.

First, there is the question of how the Pentagon would use the identification of the sequence. Would this or that recruit be placed in the infantry rather than in a support billet based solely on his genetic code?

Second, there is the irrefutable scientific fact that a person’s genetic code is only one factor is his behavior. Apart from DNA, there are cultural, education, and other influences that also affect the way a person reacts to his surroundings and to the challenges he faces.

The ACLU article makes a good point regarding the potential abuses latent in such a controversial project:

If the Pentagon has strong, nonspeculative reasons to believe that genetic research could help military effectiveness, or if it wants to make use of genetics to help with medical care just like the rest of the medical world, then let it operate in exactly the same way that civilian scientists would, under accepted scientific protocols, including meaningful informed consent, Institutional Review Boards, and other accepted standards of human-subject research.

Soldiers, having signed away many of their rights upon enlistment, should not be used for research that would not otherwise comport with our values, just because they are conveniently available.

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of this report and the suggestions made therein is the uses to which this data could be put by a government intent on singling out a particular group from among its citizens. As has been chronicled many times by The New American, the government of the United Kingdom has amassed a database that is the most extensive in any developed nation. The database was established in 1995 and is the world’s largest. It contains the DNA material of over five million Britons, a figure that represents 8 percent of the population of England and Wales. The recording system was initially developed ostensibly to aid the police in the investigation of crime scenes and function as a “vital crime-fighting tool” in tracking down elusive offenders.

Should the government of the United States or any agency thereof begin cataloging the DNA of military servicemen, the balkanization of Americans may be accomplished not just by ethnicity, but also by one’s genetic predisposition to accept the tyrannical abolition of freedom.

Filed under World Tagged with armed forces, biologists, chemists, computer scientists, culture, defense department, deffensive military operations, diagnostic applications, DNA, education, genetic code, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA, mathematicians, oceanographers, offensive military operations, pentagon collecting soldier DNA, pentagon use genetic code, phenotypes, physicists, predictive applications, scientific protocols, sequencing of genomes, soldiers' genotypes

Genetic Genocide: How Misused Science Endangers… … All Life

July 28, 2011

Genetic engineering is not new. Apparently, it has been talked about -if not applied- since the 1960′s. The issue with genetic modification of plants, animals, animals and plants, cloning and splicing genes is not its existence. It is the results of these unregulated practices what should alarm us.

by Luis R. Miranda
The Real Agenda
July 29, 2011

If you are partially or totally ignorant about genetically modified products, I will not blame you. In 15 years of research I have not been able to get a significant grasp on what genetically engineering humans, fish, soy, corn, milk and other products could mean for humankind.

When I set out to write this article my first challenge was how to present the information in a concise, yet shocking enough to wake up people who still believe that cloning humans for organ harvesting, splicing animal and human genes and making food out of human DNA or tissue is just science fiction.

I thought then, that the most appealing way to start off was to simply provide the headlines of some of the articles and documents I found during my research process, so that the readers had an immediate notion of what genetic engineering really means and how it affects them directly now and how it will affect them in the future. Posting the headlines will also facilitate the research for you and will give you the opportunity to do your own investigative work.

So let’s see what the headlines tell us.

Why the future doesn’t need us.

New Federal Guidelines Will Allow Creation of Human-Animals Chimeras

GM Food Dangers Include: Low Fertility, Organ Damage and Hormone Disruption

GM goat spins web based future

‘Spider-goats’ start work on wonder web

Transgenic fish could threaten wild populations

‘Trojan gene’ could wipe out fish

Chimeras, Cloning and Freak Human-Animal Hybrids

Bone marrow cell-mediated production of transgenic chickens Open

Part Human/Part Animal Hybrid Monsters Are Being Created By Scientists All Over The Planet

Human-rabbit clone announced and no noses twitch

The Case for Fertility Control Using Immuno-contraception

Endosulfan and Endocrine Disruption:

Human Risk Characterization

19 Studies Link GMO Foods to Organ Disruption

GMO Pesticides linked to birth defects, disruption of male hormones, cancer

On top of the fact genetic engineering is literally compared with “Playing God” with the building blocks of life, you should know that this widely exercised practice is almost completely unregulated. Furthermore, there are initiatives to promote its deregulation and to create legislation to exempt genetic engineering from all oversight. My question regarding genetic engineering deregulation was then: What would happen if scientists who are provided with unlimited money and resources have no legal liability to realize their experiments cloning humans and literally engineering new species?

Last time scientists were given unlimited funding and resources they manage to create things like the nuclear bomb, the hydrogen bomb, and nowadays, they are trying to imitate the origin of the universe with the already infamous Supercollider. We all know what happened when corporations and governments with no oversight got their hands on the first two pieces of technology.

When you think about genetically modified organisms it is always tempting to believe that such organisms are created and experimented with only in industrialized countries, where high tech labs are available. Maybe you think they are only held at research labs that belong to pharmaceutical corporations or public and private universities. What would you think if I told you that human-animal cloning, for example, is carried out in Costa Rica, and that this practice has been taking place for at least a decade there? It was reported in the Washington Post, which described discussions about human cloning among scientists:

“During one recent meeting, scientists disagreed on such basic issues as whether it would be unethical for a human embryo to begin its development in an animal’s womb, and whether a mouse would be better or worse off with a brain made of human neurons..”

So, hundreds of companies and governments are free to carry out genetic experiments in thousands of laboratories, mixing genes from several species, and are completely free to put it in food and water supplies across the planet with no oversight. That is the conclusion of the situation that we now face.

Evidence of Genetic Engineering, Cloning and Splicing

If you cannot or do not want to get into the heavy research, I am about to give you a detailed report on the state of genetic engineering, human-animal cloning and gene splicing.

Let’s start by possibly the most disturbing but not the newest fact. There are scientists out there splicing human and cow genes for the purpose of promoting the growth of human clones in cow wombs. Cloned humans and or animals would be “living drug factories by producing valuable pharmaceutical substances in their milk, or as organ factories because theirs will not be rejected by the human immune system.”

The reason for the cloning of humans and animals and the splicing of their genes is what I often cite as the sneaky treat of convenience. Sure, there is a need to find cures for all disease and to have organs available when people’s own rotten because they smoke for 40 years or drank their pension funds until the end. Would not it be convenient to have an organ bank, or a cure for lung and stomach cancer? Who would oppose to growing human fetuses in animal wombs, or extracting the organs of living animals or fellow humans to substitute our own? Convenient, right? Wrong.

In a farm near Reno Nevada, a farmer keeps sheep that hold human livers, hearts, brains among others. The “scientist” who is in charge of the experiment said he could not wait to see the effects the human cells had on the brain of the animal. He had himself injected those genes. According to the report from the Associated press, this kind of experiments fall within the new ethics guidelines that govern the type of “scientific research conducted at the farm.

In an article dated June 19 2011, The London Telegraph announces that pigs are now able to host organs from other species as “scientists have found they can create chimeric animals that have organs belonging to another species by injecting stem cells into the embryo of another species.” Another article from the Daily Mail advertises how pigs will serve as human organ farms. “Human organs could be grown inside pigs for use in transplant operations following pioneering research.” Then they launched the convenience hook again by saying that “The method would help reduce the risk of the transplanted organ being rejected.” This type of experiments will also allow animals to provide blood for transfusions whenever a patient needs it. So, the clone will be harvested for its organs and people will have on-demand organ transplantation.

The New Atlantis publication even dared to ask why wouldn’t be a good idea to use artificial wombs. The undated article claims that using human and / or animal cells or genes is a fairly new and imperfect practice. Probably the author ignores that this kind genetic manipulation has been discussed -if not applied- since the mid 1960′s. So there is nothing new here.

The Plan Behind Genetically Engineering Humans and Food

One aspect often ignored in the discussion of human cloning and genetic engineering, is the goals; the real goals these practices seek. Because believe, no matter how convenient it sounds, it is not for aiding humans live a longer, healthier life. Corporations and tax payer funded universities are researching how to enhance human and other forms of life because those who get to implement these technologies intend to have a humanless future. Does it sound insane enough? The article on The New Atlantis attempts to be positive about these experiments and related them to a brighter, healthier future for humankind. “Today, we have inched slightly—but only slightly—closer to perfecting the technology that would realize Haldane’s vision, albeit for reasons other than the eugenic improvement of the race.” The problem is, that is exactly where human genetic experiments originated and that is why they are still being carried out. If the future does not need humans to invent, design, construct, repair or reproduce, why would the world need humans? Mimicking human reproductive powers, as the author from The New Atlantis says, is named “ectogenesis” and has been tried for centuries.

Rather than expending all scientific talent and resources developing artificial wombs,” Reason science correspondent Ronald Bailey wrote recently, “I suspect that it will be much easier and cheaper to establish pregnancies with human embryos in other mammals, like cows and horses, than it will be to achieve the same thing using artificial uteruses.”

Although modern technology allows all kinds of experiments in medicine, food, water and even air, the overall goal is not and will not be to help humanity extend its presence in this planet. Most articles I found through my research present all kind of scenarios where genetic engineering would be applied for our benefit. From spider goats to human milk in cows’ utters, genetically modified salmon, soy or corn, the applications seem to be endless. One of the most common responses when pro GMO people are questioned about the dangers of playing with life is that it will help feed the hungry or aid the poor.

But in practice, any and all life extension technology -as we see it now with electronics- only cause further degeneration of the human race. Through convenience, empty promises and what ifs, those who are empowered by their riches and political power want to use our own DNA to end human life as we know it.

In an article titled Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us, Wired magazine explores the possibility that humans will become a threatened species as more and more technologies turn us into useless eaters, as some globalists have called humankind. Humans who are ‘chosen’ to actually take advantage of the latest technology will merge with robots or become robots in what will become the next sentient creatures. As Ray Kurzweil, the inventor of the first reading machine for the blind writes in his book The Age of Spiritual Machines, those fortunate humans will gain near immortality by becoming one with robotic technology. But what will happen to the rest of us, or our children and grandchildren who will come after us?

What does the Genetic Engineering Threat Entail?

Simply put, the out-of-control insanity of modern science and biotechnology implies Genetic Genocide. Depending on where you obtain information, scientists and researchers coincide that the common denominator of genetically engineered forms of life is the end of current forms of life. According to researcher Jeffrey Smith, when lab animals were fed genetically engineered organisms, it resulted in complete sterilization. Such sterilization came in some cases in the second and third generations, but scientists also saw test subjects losing its capacity to reproduce during the subject’s life term.

William Muir and Richard Howard of Purdue University, Indiana, warned about a ‘trojan’ gene in fish which could wipe out natural forms of fish off the planet if GM fish are released into the wild or escape from farms. “This resembles the Trojan horse,” said Muir. “It gets into the population looking like something good and it ends up destroying the population.” Both Muir and Howard studied the use of human growth hormone in fish, which in now being used in laboratory experiments to make salmon grow bigger, faster while eating less feed. The researchers found that GM fish turned sexually mature faster than the rest and produced more eggs as well. According to a report from the BBC, professor Muir asserts that GMO fish “would enjoy the same reproductive advantages of a natural one, so the hGH gene would quickly spread through a fish population.”

Human Growth Hormone (hGH) is also put in the feed given to cattle and other farm animals which humans consume later. Coincidentally, both male and female humans have experienced physical development with girls getting to puberty at earlier and earlier ages, while boys have suffered from hormonal changes that many researchers associate with the feminization of a large portion of human males.

Other studies on genetically modified organisms show that its consumption results in problems such as low fertility, organ damage and hormone disruption. This last one is specifically important, because it is through hormonal disruption that some scientists have discovered how and why some men are beginning to lose interest in mating and some women choose same sex mates instead of men. In the study titled: “A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health” the International Journal on Biological Sciences found that Monsanto’s Bt corn contributes to liver failure. All types of Monsanto-created GMO corn (Mon 863, Mon810, and NK 603) are approved by the FDA and labeled as safe for human consumption in the United States and Europe.

Other studies conducted using pesticides, revealed that these chemical products cause endocrine disruptions. Ingredients such as glyphosate, used in Roundup, increases the number of birth defects in animals. Birth defects include something called cyclopia, or the appearance of one single eye in the middle of the forehead. Additionally, glyphosate causes stillbirths and miscarriages.

A study conducted in Argentina, confirmed what older studies have found regarding the consequences of ingesting products contaminated with pesticides and herbicides. Andres Carrasco, head of the Molecular Embryology Laboratory at the University of Buenos Aires, presented a report that explains how Monsanto’s Roundup is responsible for causing infertility, sperm destruction, and cancer. Carrasco tested the effects of glyphosate on animal embryos and found that the chemical alters and impairs proper embryonic development. “I didn’t discover anything new,” said Carrasco, “I just confirmed what other scientists discovered… There is scientific proof and, above all, there are hundreds of affected towns [that] are a living evidence of this public health emergency.”

Recently, the UK Daily Mail reported on how scientist in England are experimenting with half human, half animal clones and how these experiments have been kept in secret. “The revelation comes just a day after a committee of scientists warned of a nightmare ‘Planet of the Apes’ scenario in which work on human-animal creations goes too far,” reads the article.

But the toughest cookie to chew is not any of these examples of human, animal or plant manipulations I have provided examples of. As mentioned before, nothing good comes out of corporations, governments, or for that matter scientists controlled by and / or paid for these two entities. The subject then, moves to bio-weapons. For the past century, at least, governments in association with the biotechnology industry launched a movement to produce biological weapons that were race specific. These bio-weapons would be used in war to wipe out enemy populations. What are the chances that those bio-weapons are used on all of us? Just about the same chances genetically engineered organisms have of making it to our food and water supplies. In other words, it is highly likely. As the link above exemplifies, former US Defense Secretary William Cohen described what he thought was the threat posed by certain countries that sought to develop “certain types of pathogens” that were ethnic-specific.

The infamous document titled: Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources describes how the establishment may seek to develop “advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes… …transforming biological warfare into a political useful tool.” No matter what human or animal disease you think about, rest assured that the establishment has thought of them all as possible biological weapons. Hemorrhagic fever, Ebola are two of those experimented upon weapons, which by the way were first tested on animals.

Aside from biological weapons, the more mundane genetic engineering that is supposed to benefit humanity is suddenly turning against its creators. Those tiny modifications performed to human, animal and plant genes, are not finding their ways out of human control and getting to other species. As reported on GM.org, scientists at Bristol University announced the discovery of a route, which genetically engineered organisms ‘jump’ through to invade the environment. This invasion, the scientists say could come in the form of infection or multiplication, no matter what barriers are set between species.

So if it is not from natural mutation or infection derived from some insane scientists “Playing God”, humans are threatened by establishment-created biological weapons that can be directed to specific races or ethnicities. Choose your poison. Either way, we have been and continue to be genetically engineered.

GMO foods and other chemicals are the origin of most allergies. Meanwhile, governments fight alongside with pharmaceutical and chemical corporations to ban any type of labeling of GMO ingredients in food. Most people do not even know that the meat they are eating comes from a cloned or cross species bull or that the milk they are drinking comes from a cloned cow. How could they? There are no labels!

The rates of once rare diseases such as cancer, diabetes, autism as well as allergies and other health problems are now going through the roof, and this has no other origin, as I have shown here, than the genetic Russian roulette game played by mad scientists who are supported by an out-of-control ruling class. The same people who experimented on children by giving them polio and syphilis, the same establishment that weaponized air borne Ebola and finances abortions in China; who tell us that family planning is the greatest tool for women’s independence are the same people that in the pursue of ‘human immortality’ are endangering our own existence.

This is what we know about the threat posed to humans by Genetic Engineering. This is what I know, anyways. Can you imagine what we do not know?

Consulted Materials:

Life Magazine. Control of Life. 1965.

Wired Magazine. Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us. April 2000.